Drivers of phenological transitions in the seedling life stage

Abstract Plant functional ecology research has primarily focused on juvenile and adult plants even though regeneration from seed can be the most consequential life‐history bottleneck with cascading influence on later stages of growth and reproduction. Understandings of relationships among phenology, morphology and growth‐related functional traits have improved our knowledge of plant life‐history strategies and adaptive responses to changing climate. However, whether relationships among phenological and morpho‐physiological traits exist during plant regeneration is unknown. We also lack understanding of the relative importance of these relationships compared with those of regeneration phenology with other factors like plant phylogeny, geographic location and whether a species is native or non‐native to the location. To better understand these gaps in knowledge, we evaluated three phenological traits (days to germination, first and third true leaves) and six morpho‐physiological traits (seed mass, relative growth rate, root elongation rate, root: shoot ratio, specific leaf area and seedling C:N) associated with regeneration for 131 forb species from six globally distributed grasslands. Morpho‐physiological traits showed several significant correlations with phenological traits. Boosted regression trees revealed that their relative importance in predicting phenological traits varied among the three phenological stages (34%–51%). Interestingly, the relative importance of morpho‐physiological traits on the phenological stages was comparable to that of phylogeny (36%–46%). In general, species with faster phenologies produced seedlings that grew faster. The influence of geographic location on phenological traits was strongest at germination (29%) and decreased (8%–15%) at later phenological stages. Native versus non‐native origin had little to no impact (0%–2%) on regeneration phenology. Strong relationships between days to germination and geographic location indicate signatures of local adaptation in the earliest life stages. Similar morpho‐physiological trait values between native and non‐native forbs imply that trait matching may be essential for non‐native establishment. While associations between phenological and morpho‐physiological traits during regeneration have not been previously recognized, our results suggest that these are complex and variable across plant regeneration. Better understanding of these associations and their variation across plant life stages may help capture species shifts with ongoing climate change and be used to develop novel approaches to seed‐based restoration. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70003
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Plant and animal studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers of phenological transitions in the seedling life stage

Mandy L. Slate, Maria Sporbert, Dean E. Pearson, Isabell Hensen et al.
2 citations
Functional Ecology
Plant and animal studies
6.05
article

Drivers of phenological transitions in the seedling life stage

Mandy L. Slate, Maria Sporbert, Dean E. Pearson, Isabell Hensen, Christoph Rosche, Lotte Korell, José L. Hierro, Frieder Wolf, Lauren P. Waller, Loralee Larios, Dávid U. Nagy
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Plant functional ecology research has primarily focused on juvenile and adult plants even though regeneration from seed can be the most consequential life‐history bottleneck with cascading influence on later stages of growth and reproduction. Understandings of relationships among phenology, morphology and growth‐related functional traits have improved our knowledge of plant life‐history strategies and adaptive responses to changing climate. However, whether relationships among phenological and morpho‐physiological traits exist during plant regeneration is unknown. We also lack understanding of the relative importance of these relationships compared with those of regeneration phenology with other factors like plant phylogeny, geographic location and whether a species is native or non‐native to the location. To better understand these gaps in knowledge, we evaluated three phenological traits (days to germination, first and third true leaves) and six morpho‐physiological traits (seed mass, relative growth rate, root elongation rate, root: shoot ratio, specific leaf area and seedling C:N) associated with regeneration for 131 forb species from six globally distributed grasslands. Morpho‐physiological traits showed several significant correlations with phenological traits. Boosted regression trees revealed that their relative importance in predicting phenological traits varied among the three phenological stages (34%–51%). Interestingly, the relative importance of morpho‐physiological traits on the phenological stages was comparable to that of phylogeny (36%–46%). In general, species with faster phenologies produced seedlings that grew faster. The influence of geographic location on phenological traits was strongest at germination (29%) and decreased (8%–15%) at later phenological stages. Native versus non‐native origin had little to no impact (0%–2%) on regeneration phenology. Strong relationships between days to germination and geographic location indicate signatures of local adaptation in the earliest life stages. Similar morpho‐physiological trait values between native and non‐native forbs imply that trait matching may be essential for non‐native establishment. While associations between phenological and morpho‐physiological traits during regeneration have not been previously recognized, our results suggest that these are complex and variable across plant regeneration. Better understanding of these associations and their variation across plant life stages may help capture species shifts with ongoing climate change and be used to develop novel approaches to seed‐based restoration. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional Ecology
University of California, Riverside (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Lincoln University (NZ), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Universidad Nacional de La Pampa (AR), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), Rocky Mountain Research (United States) (US), University of Montana (US), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Directorate for Biological Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Plant and animal studies
6.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.