Comparing reflected and emitted radiometric signal levels in short-wave infrared, extended short-wave infrared, mid-wave infrared, and superband (short-wave infrared through mid-wave infrared) optical systems

With the improvement of infrared detector technology over the last several decades, traditional design trades regarding the use of different wavebands in optical systems are becoming less and less applicable. Current detector technology is allowing for extended and even bridged wavebands, where previous detectors were limited to only a single waveband. These bridged waveband cameras, or superband cameras, contain detectors with response over large spectral spans, allowing them to take advantage of the unique properties of multiple wavebands. This type of system is especially of interest when the superband contains both the short-wave infrared (SWIR) waveband—where most of the signal comes from reflected light— to mid-wave infrared (MWIR) waveband—where most of the signal comes from emitted light. Such a superband system allows the combination of reflected and emitted light on a single detector, opening different system-level optical design trades across many fields and disciplines. Presented is a comparison of reflected and emitted radiometric signal levels for four filtered wavebands using a 1.5- to 5.4-μm superband imaging system: (1) with a 1.9-μm SWIR short-pass filter, (2) with a 2- to 2.5-μm extended SWIR (eSWIR) bandpass filter, (3) with a 3-μm MWIR long-pass filter, and (4) with no filter (i.e., full superband response). The comparison in each of the four wavebands is repeated under four solar illumination conditions: full daylight, clouds, dusk, and night.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Optical Engineering
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.oe.64.2.023102
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing reflected and emitted radiometric signal levels in short-wave infrared, extended short-wave infrared, mid-wave infrared, and superband (short-wave infrared through mid-wave infrared) optical systems

Patrick Leslie, Ron Driggers, Kyle Renshaw, Shane Jordan et al.
2 citations
Optical Engineering
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
9.99
article

Comparing reflected and emitted radiometric signal levels in short-wave infrared, extended short-wave infrared, mid-wave infrared, and superband (short-wave infrared through mid-wave infrared) optical systems

Patrick Leslie, Ron Driggers, Kyle Renshaw, Shane Jordan, Luke Somerville
article en
2 citations

Abstract

With the improvement of infrared detector technology over the last several decades, traditional design trades regarding the use of different wavebands in optical systems are becoming less and less applicable. Current detector technology is allowing for extended and even bridged wavebands, where previous detectors were limited to only a single waveband. These bridged waveband cameras, or superband cameras, contain detectors with response over large spectral spans, allowing them to take advantage of the unique properties of multiple wavebands. This type of system is especially of interest when the superband contains both the short-wave infrared (SWIR) waveband—where most of the signal comes from reflected light— to mid-wave infrared (MWIR) waveband—where most of the signal comes from emitted light. Such a superband system allows the combination of reflected and emitted light on a single detector, opening different system-level optical design trades across many fields and disciplines. Presented is a comparison of reflected and emitted radiometric signal levels for four filtered wavebands using a 1.5- to 5.4-μm superband imaging system: (1) with a 1.9-μm SWIR short-pass filter, (2) with a 2- to 2.5-μm extended SWIR (eSWIR) bandpass filter, (3) with a 3-μm MWIR long-pass filter, and (4) with no filter (i.e., full superband response). The comparison in each of the four wavebands is repeated under four solar illumination conditions: full daylight, clouds, dusk, and night.

Optical EngineeringVol. 64(02)
University of Central Florida (US), University of Arizona (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Infrared Target Detection Methodologies
9.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.