Mining software repositories for software architecture — A systematic mapping study

A growing number of researchers are investigating how Mining Software Repositories (MSR) approaches can support software architecture activities, such as architecture recovery, tactics identification, architectural smell detection, and others. However, as of today, it is difficult to have a clear view of existing research on MSR for software architecture. The objective of this study is to identify, classify, and summarize the state-of-the-art MSR approaches applied to software architecture (MSR4SA). This study is designed according to the systematic mapping study research method. Specifically, out of 2442 potentially relevant studies, we systematically identify 151 primary studies where MSR approaches are applied to perform software architecture activities. Then, we rigorously extract relevant data from each primary study and synthesize the obtained results to produce a clear map of reasons for adopting MSR approaches to support architecting activities, used data sources, applied MSR techniques, and captured architectural information. The major reasons to adopt MSR4SA techniques are about addressing industrial concerns like achieving quality attributes and minimizing practitioners’ efforts . Most MSR4SA studies support architectural analysis, while architectural synthesis and evaluation are not commonly supported in MSR4SA studies. The most frequently mined data sources are source code repositories and issue trackers , which are also commonly mined together. Most of the MSR4SA studies apply more than one mining technique, where the most common MSR techniques are: ( source code analysis , model analysis , statistical analysis ), ( machine learning , NLP ). Architectural quality issues and components are the mostly mined type of information. Our results give a solid foundation for researchers and practitioners towards future research and applications of MSR approaches for software architecture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information and Software Technology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107677
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mining software repositories for software architecture — A systematic mapping study

Mohamed Soliman, Andreas Wortmann, Michel Albonico, Ivano Malavolta
1 citations
Information and Software Technology
Software Engineering Research
3.25
article

Mining software repositories for software architecture — A systematic mapping study

Mohamed Soliman, Andreas Wortmann, Michel Albonico, Ivano Malavolta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A growing number of researchers are investigating how Mining Software Repositories (MSR) approaches can support software architecture activities, such as architecture recovery, tactics identification, architectural smell detection, and others. However, as of today, it is difficult to have a clear view of existing research on MSR for software architecture. The objective of this study is to identify, classify, and summarize the state-of-the-art MSR approaches applied to software architecture (MSR4SA). This study is designed according to the systematic mapping study research method. Specifically, out of 2442 potentially relevant studies, we systematically identify 151 primary studies where MSR approaches are applied to perform software architecture activities. Then, we rigorously extract relevant data from each primary study and synthesize the obtained results to produce a clear map of reasons for adopting MSR approaches to support architecting activities, used data sources, applied MSR techniques, and captured architectural information. The major reasons to adopt MSR4SA techniques are about addressing industrial concerns like achieving quality attributes and minimizing practitioners’ efforts . Most MSR4SA studies support architectural analysis, while architectural synthesis and evaluation are not commonly supported in MSR4SA studies. The most frequently mined data sources are source code repositories and issue trackers , which are also commonly mined together. Most of the MSR4SA studies apply more than one mining technique, where the most common MSR techniques are: ( source code analysis , model analysis , statistical analysis ), ( machine learning , NLP ). Architectural quality issues and components are the mostly mined type of information. Our results give a solid foundation for researchers and practitioners towards future research and applications of MSR approaches for software architecture.

Information and Software TechnologyVol. 181
University of Stuttgart (DE), Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (BR), Paderborn University (DE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Software Engineering Research
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.