Three Complementary Sampling Approaches Provide Comprehensive Characterization of Pesticide Contamination in Urban Stormwater

Urban areas are expanding rapidly and experience diverse and complex contamination of their surface waters. Addressing these issues requires different tools to describe exposures and predict toxicological risk to exposed biota. We surveyed 21 stormwater management ponds in Brampton, Ontario using three types of sampling methods deployed concurrently: time-integrated water sampling, biofilms cultured on artificial substrates, and organic-diffusive gradients in thin films (o-DGT) passive samplers. Our objective was to compare pesticide occurrences and concentrations to inform monitoring in stormwater ponds, which reflect pesticide pollution in urban areas. We detected 82 pesticides across the three sampling matrices, with most detections occurring in o-DGT samplers. The in situ accumulation of pesticides in o-DGTs during deployment and the high analytical sensitivity achieved establishes o-DGTs as excellent tools for capturing the mixtures of pesticides present. Water and biofilm sampling demonstrated that pesticide concentrations available for uptake are relatively low, with most below toxicological thresholds. Yet our results demonstrate that urban areas are subject to a wide range of pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, and underscores the urgency of research to quantify the risks of chronic exposure to this chemical mixture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Science
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci9020043
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three Complementary Sampling Approaches Provide Comprehensive Characterization of Pesticide Contamination in Urban Stormwater

Rebecca C. Rooney, Paul A. Helm, Melanie Raby, Mark W. Sumarah et al.
4 citations
Urban Science
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
3.27
article

Three Complementary Sampling Approaches Provide Comprehensive Characterization of Pesticide Contamination in Urban Stormwater

Rebecca C. Rooney, Paul A. Helm, Melanie Raby, Mark W. Sumarah, Ryan S. Prosser, Justin B. Renaud, Gab Izma, Daniel McIsaac
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Urban areas are expanding rapidly and experience diverse and complex contamination of their surface waters. Addressing these issues requires different tools to describe exposures and predict toxicological risk to exposed biota. We surveyed 21 stormwater management ponds in Brampton, Ontario using three types of sampling methods deployed concurrently: time-integrated water sampling, biofilms cultured on artificial substrates, and organic-diffusive gradients in thin films (o-DGT) passive samplers. Our objective was to compare pesticide occurrences and concentrations to inform monitoring in stormwater ponds, which reflect pesticide pollution in urban areas. We detected 82 pesticides across the three sampling matrices, with most detections occurring in o-DGT samplers. The in situ accumulation of pesticides in o-DGTs during deployment and the high analytical sensitivity achieved establishes o-DGTs as excellent tools for capturing the mixtures of pesticides present. Water and biofilm sampling demonstrated that pesticide concentrations available for uptake are relatively low, with most below toxicological thresholds. Yet our results demonstrate that urban areas are subject to a wide range of pesticides, including herbicides, insecticides, and fungicides, and underscores the urgency of research to quantify the risks of chronic exposure to this chemical mixture.

Urban ScienceVol. 9(2)
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), Ministry of Environment (CA), London Research and Development Centre, University of Guelph (CA)
Government of Ontario
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
3.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.