An Automated System for Tracking, Recording, and Reminding for Medical Implants (TRACER)—a Pilot Study with Ureteral Stents

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is an urgent need for a seamless clinical system for tracking implants deployed transiently in patients, to reduce the morbidity related to omission of timely removal. Using a ubiquitous implant of ureteral stents as a pilot project, we developed a novel system (Automated System for Tracking, Recording, and Reminding of Implants [TRACER]) that allows seamless tracking and deployment of reminders to clinicians, without the need for excessive infrastructural overhaul of existing hospital processes. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Briefly, TRACER comprises the following: (1) a two-pronged trigger during implant (stent) insertion to associate implant, patient, and physician details; (2) data field verification by an automated algorithm; (3) automated delivery of reminders to clinicians at a predefined time period if needed; and (4) cessation of reminders upon stent removal. To evaluate the efficacy of TRACER, the records of all stents placed between January 2022 and December 2023 were reviewed and compared between manual stent log entries, electronic operative records, and the TRACER dataset. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1056 ureteral stents were placed through 927 procedures in 713 patients. Fifteen stents could have been omitted from tracking owing to an incomplete trigger during stent insertion (logged by one party rather than two) but were detected by the TRACER system during data validation. Sixty-one (5.9%) stents were identified by TRACER as not removed past the predefined time period; 41 patients (3.9%) were contacted and successfully returned for stent removal. Aside from eight patients transferred to other hospitals for care, the demise of seven patients, and five tumor stents not due for change within the study period, all stents were removed on time. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TRACER is effective, safe, and viable and provides significant savings on manpower. It demonstrates high potential to be scaled and expanded to all implantable devices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0620
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Automated System for Tracking, Recording, and Reminding for Medical Implants (TRACER)—a Pilot Study with Ureteral Stents

Moarie Grace Tan, Gladys Tang, Han Jie Lee, Shu Ye et al.
Journal of Endourology
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

An Automated System for Tracking, Recording, and Reminding for Medical Implants (TRACER)—a Pilot Study with Ureteral Stents

Moarie Grace Tan, Gladys Tang, Han Jie Lee, Shu Ye, Paul Khoo, J.Y. Tay, Sing Yi Chia, Matthew Tan, Lui Shiong Lee, Kenneth K. Y. Ho
article en

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> There is an urgent need for a seamless clinical system for tracking implants deployed transiently in patients, to reduce the morbidity related to omission of timely removal. Using a ubiquitous implant of ureteral stents as a pilot project, we developed a novel system (Automated System for Tracking, Recording, and Reminding of Implants [TRACER]) that allows seamless tracking and deployment of reminders to clinicians, without the need for excessive infrastructural overhaul of existing hospital processes. <b><i>Patients and Methods:</i></b> Briefly, TRACER comprises the following: (1) a two-pronged trigger during implant (stent) insertion to associate implant, patient, and physician details; (2) data field verification by an automated algorithm; (3) automated delivery of reminders to clinicians at a predefined time period if needed; and (4) cessation of reminders upon stent removal. To evaluate the efficacy of TRACER, the records of all stents placed between January 2022 and December 2023 were reviewed and compared between manual stent log entries, electronic operative records, and the TRACER dataset. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 1056 ureteral stents were placed through 927 procedures in 713 patients. Fifteen stents could have been omitted from tracking owing to an incomplete trigger during stent insertion (logged by one party rather than two) but were detected by the TRACER system during data validation. Sixty-one (5.9%) stents were identified by TRACER as not removed past the predefined time period; 41 patients (3.9%) were contacted and successfully returned for stent removal. Aside from eight patients transferred to other hospitals for care, the demise of seven patients, and five tumor stents not due for change within the study period, all stents were removed on time. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> TRACER is effective, safe, and viable and provides significant savings on manpower. It demonstrates high potential to be scaled and expanded to all implantable devices.

Journal of EndourologyVol. 39(4)
SingHealth (SG), Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.