Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training

Creating information technologies intended for broad use that allow everyone to participate safely online—which we refer to as inclusive digital safety —requires understanding and addressing the digital-safety needs of a diverse range of users who face elevated risk of technology-facilitated attacks or disproportionate harm from such attacks—i.e., at-risk users . This article draws from more than 9 years of our work at Google to understand and support the digital safety of at-risk users—including survivors of intimate partner abuse, people involved with political campaigns, content creators, youth, and more—in technology intended for broad use. Among our learnings is that designing for inclusive digital safety across widely varied user needs and dynamic contexts is a wicked problem with no “correct” solution. Given this, we describe frameworks and design principles we have developed to help make at-risk research findings practically applicable to technologies intended for broad use and lessons we have learned about communicating them to practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3716382
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training

Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Andreas Kramm, Patrick Gage Kelley, Manya Sleeper et al.
2 citations
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
article

Supporting the Digital Safety of At-Risk Users: Lessons Learned from 9+ Years of Research and Training

Jill Palzkill Woelfer, Andreas Kramm, Patrick Gage Kelley, Manya Sleeper, Andrew Oplinger, Kurt Thomas, Elie Bursztein, Sunny Consolvo, Dalila Szostak, Stephan Somogyi, Tara Matthews, Andreas Schou, Lan You, Anthony Turner, Izzie Zahorian, Lea Kissner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Creating information technologies intended for broad use that allow everyone to participate safely online—which we refer to as inclusive digital safety —requires understanding and addressing the digital-safety needs of a diverse range of users who face elevated risk of technology-facilitated attacks or disproportionate harm from such attacks—i.e., at-risk users . This article draws from more than 9 years of our work at Google to understand and support the digital safety of at-risk users—including survivors of intimate partner abuse, people involved with political campaigns, content creators, youth, and more—in technology intended for broad use. Among our learnings is that designing for inclusive digital safety across widely varied user needs and dynamic contexts is a wicked problem with no “correct” solution. Given this, we describe frameworks and design principles we have developed to help make at-risk research findings practically applicable to technologies intended for broad use and lessons we have learned about communicating them to practitioners.

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionVol. 32(3)
Google (United States) (US), LinkedIn (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.