Physics-informed neural network solution of the generalized (1+1) dimensional Sine-Gordon equation

We employed a novel physics-informed neural networks (PINN) to tackle (1+1) dimensional Sine-Gordon equation (SGE). A test problem with known analytical solution is numerically solved to demonstrate the effectiveness of the PINN, and compared to standard explicit finite difference method (EFDM) and Chen-Charpentier et al.’s finite difference method (CCFDM). Although the three methods used show good agreement, our research shows that the EFDM results accord with the analytical solution the best. Given the consistent agreement between the numerical results obtained by all three methods and the analytical solution, all three methods are recommended as competitive options. The methods employed in this study can be a valuable asset for present and future model developers engaged in various nonlinear physical wave phenomena, such as solitons evolution or soliton interaction as well as optical pulses propagation in nonlinear media, including optical fibers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icsidp62679.2024.10868340
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-informed neural network solution of the generalized (1+1) dimensional Sine-Gordon equation

Svetislav Savović, Zhuo Wang, Branko Drljača, Rui Min et al.
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics-informed neural network solution of the generalized (1+1) dimensional Sine-Gordon equation

Svetislav Savović, Zhuo Wang, Branko Drljača, Rui Min, Ana Simović, Miloš Ivanović
article en

Abstract

We employed a novel physics-informed neural networks (PINN) to tackle (1+1) dimensional Sine-Gordon equation (SGE). A test problem with known analytical solution is numerically solved to demonstrate the effectiveness of the PINN, and compared to standard explicit finite difference method (EFDM) and Chen-Charpentier et al.’s finite difference method (CCFDM). Although the three methods used show good agreement, our research shows that the EFDM results accord with the analytical solution the best. Given the consistent agreement between the numerical results obtained by all three methods and the analytical solution, all three methods are recommended as competitive options. The methods employed in this study can be a valuable asset for present and future model developers engaged in various nonlinear physical wave phenomena, such as solitons evolution or soliton interaction as well as optical pulses propagation in nonlinear media, including optical fibers.

University of Kragujevac (RS), Beijing Normal University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.