Exploring the impact of a CALL tool for emergent bilinguals

Abstract This study evaluates the impact of a computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tool for the acquisition of academic English and oral language skills in children learning English as a second language. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compare English proficiency scores for K-5 students who did or did not use the program during the 2020–21 school year. Analyses showed that learners who used the program scored higher on the overall test, including on the oral and written domains, compared to students who did not use the program. When controlling for prior year achievement, we found small, positive but non-significant effects for program users. Proficiency analyses did not reveal any significant differences between student groups. The results show promising evidence that CALL tools, and particularly those focused on oral language development, can be used to provide structured support to students for learning academic English and developing greater overall English language proficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Technology Research and Development
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10462-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impact of a CALL tool for emergent bilinguals

Rajendra Chattergoon, Nick Feroce, Jenny Liu
2 citations
Educational Technology Research and Development
Speech and dialogue systems
4.96
article

Exploring the impact of a CALL tool for emergent bilinguals

Rajendra Chattergoon, Nick Feroce, Jenny Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study evaluates the impact of a computer-assisted language learning (CALL) tool for the acquisition of academic English and oral language skills in children learning English as a second language. Using a quasi-experimental design, we compare English proficiency scores for K-5 students who did or did not use the program during the 2020–21 school year. Analyses showed that learners who used the program scored higher on the overall test, including on the oral and written domains, compared to students who did not use the program. When controlling for prior year achievement, we found small, positive but non-significant effects for program users. Proficiency analyses did not reveal any significant differences between student groups. The results show promising evidence that CALL tools, and particularly those focused on oral language development, can be used to provide structured support to students for learning academic English and developing greater overall English language proficiency.

Educational Technology Research and DevelopmentVol. 73(3)
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Speech and dialogue systems
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.