Path Planning Algorithm Based on Improved RRT and Artificial Potential Field

In addressing the issues of poor goal orientation, slow convergence speed, and lengthy search times associated with the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm in robotic path planning, we propose an improved RRT algorithm. Firstly, a goal biasing strategy is employed to guide the random tree towards the target node, enhancing the algorithm’s goal orientation. Secondly, we define a target region where sampled points must lie; if a sample point falls outside this region, resampling is performed to restrict the sampling area. Finally, we incorporate an artificial potential field approach to improve obstacle avoidance and further bias the tree towards the target node during expansion. Experimental results demonstrate that the Improved RRT algorithm outperforms the P+Bias-RRT, T-RRT, T-RRT+APF, and RRT<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">*</sup> algorithms in terms of path length, search time, and number of paths in both sparse and dense obstacle environments within a three-dimensional space. These findings validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. This electronic document is a “live” template. The various components of your paper [title, text, heads, etc.] are already defined on the style sheet, as illustrated by the portions given in this document.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icemce64157.2024.10861913
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Path Planning Algorithm Based on Improved RRT and Artificial Potential Field

Xiaodi Du, Ping Luo, Xiafu Lv
1 citations
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
0.25
article

Path Planning Algorithm Based on Improved RRT and Artificial Potential Field

Xiaodi Du, Ping Luo, Xiafu Lv
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In addressing the issues of poor goal orientation, slow convergence speed, and lengthy search times associated with the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm in robotic path planning, we propose an improved RRT algorithm. Firstly, a goal biasing strategy is employed to guide the random tree towards the target node, enhancing the algorithm’s goal orientation. Secondly, we define a target region where sampled points must lie; if a sample point falls outside this region, resampling is performed to restrict the sampling area. Finally, we incorporate an artificial potential field approach to improve obstacle avoidance and further bias the tree towards the target node during expansion. Experimental results demonstrate that the Improved RRT algorithm outperforms the P+Bias-RRT, T-RRT, T-RRT+APF, and RRT<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">*</sup> algorithms in terms of path length, search time, and number of paths in both sparse and dense obstacle environments within a three-dimensional space. These findings validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. This electronic document is a “live” template. The various components of your paper [title, text, heads, etc.] are already defined on the style sheet, as illustrated by the portions given in this document.

Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
0.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Path Planning Algorithm Based on Improved RRT and Artificial Potential Field — Xiaodi Du, Ping Luo, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS