Safety and Efficacy in the Transcortical and Transsylvian Approach in Insular High-Grade Gliomas: A Comparative Series of 58 Patients

Gliomas within the insular region represent one of the most challenging problems in neurosurgical oncology. There are two main surgical approaches to address the complex vascular network and functional areas around the insula: the transsylvian approach and the transcortical approach. In the literature, there is not a clear consensus on the best approach in terms of safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches and to analyze prognostic factors on the natural history of insular gliomas. Patients with newly diagnosed high-grade insular gliomas who underwent surgery between January 2019 and June 2024 were analyzed. The series was analyzed according to the classification of Berger-Sanai and Yaşargil. The Karnofsky performance score (KPS), extent of resection (EOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were considered the outcome measures. A total of 58 primary high-grade insular glioma patients were enrolled in this study. The IDH mutation was found in 13/58 (22.4%); specifically, 3/13 (23.1%) were grade 4, and 10/13 (76.9%) were grade 3. Furthermore, 40/58 patients (69%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), 15 patients (26%) subtotal resection, and 3 patients (5%) partial resection. Middle cerebral artery encasement negatively affected the OS. GTR, radiotherapy, KPS, and autonomous deambulation at a month after surgery positively affected the OS. The surgical approach used was transsylvian and transcortical in 11 and 47 cases, respectively. The comparison between the two different approaches did not display differences in terms of neurological deficits and OS (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The transcortical approach was related to the greater achievement of GTR (<i>p</i> = 0.031). According to the Berger-Sanai classification, the transcortical approach has higher EOR and postoperative KPS when the lesion is in zone III-IV (<i>p</i> = 0.029). Greater resection of insular gliomas can be achieved with an acceptable morbidity profile and is predictive of improved OS. Both the transsylvian and transcortical corridors to the insula are associated with low morbidity profiles. The transcortical approach with intraoperative mapping is more favorable for achieving greater EOR, particularly in gliomas within the inferior border of the Sylvian fissure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Oncology
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020098
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and Efficacy in the Transcortical and Transsylvian Approach in Insular High-Grade Gliomas: A Comparative Series of 58 Patients

Flavio Panico, Daniele Armocida, Alberto Morello, Antonio Melcarne et al.
1 citations
Current Oncology
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
article

Safety and Efficacy in the Transcortical and Transsylvian Approach in Insular High-Grade Gliomas: A Comparative Series of 58 Patients

Flavio Panico, Daniele Armocida, Alberto Morello, Antonio Melcarne, Giulia Chiari, Francesco Zenga, S. Crasto, Giovanni Morana, Diego Garbossa, Francesca Rizzo, Andrea Bianconi, Fabio Cofano, Roberta Rudà, Andrea Gatto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Gliomas within the insular region represent one of the most challenging problems in neurosurgical oncology. There are two main surgical approaches to address the complex vascular network and functional areas around the insula: the transsylvian approach and the transcortical approach. In the literature, there is not a clear consensus on the best approach in terms of safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches and to analyze prognostic factors on the natural history of insular gliomas. Patients with newly diagnosed high-grade insular gliomas who underwent surgery between January 2019 and June 2024 were analyzed. The series was analyzed according to the classification of Berger-Sanai and Yaşargil. The Karnofsky performance score (KPS), extent of resection (EOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were considered the outcome measures. A total of 58 primary high-grade insular glioma patients were enrolled in this study. The IDH mutation was found in 13/58 (22.4%); specifically, 3/13 (23.1%) were grade 4, and 10/13 (76.9%) were grade 3. Furthermore, 40/58 patients (69%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), 15 patients (26%) subtotal resection, and 3 patients (5%) partial resection. Middle cerebral artery encasement negatively affected the OS. GTR, radiotherapy, KPS, and autonomous deambulation at a month after surgery positively affected the OS. The surgical approach used was transsylvian and transcortical in 11 and 47 cases, respectively. The comparison between the two different approaches did not display differences in terms of neurological deficits and OS (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The transcortical approach was related to the greater achievement of GTR (<i>p</i> = 0.031). According to the Berger-Sanai classification, the transcortical approach has higher EOR and postoperative KPS when the lesion is in zone III-IV (<i>p</i> = 0.029). Greater resection of insular gliomas can be achieved with an acceptable morbidity profile and is predictive of improved OS. Both the transsylvian and transcortical corridors to the insula are associated with low morbidity profiles. The transcortical approach with intraoperative mapping is more favorable for achieving greater EOR, particularly in gliomas within the inferior border of the Sylvian fissure.

Current OncologyVol. 32(2)
Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Basque Center for Applied Mathematics (ES), Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT), Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.