Research on 2D Mapping for Mobile Transport Robots Based on SLAM

Many existing studies predominantly focus on the performance of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms within single environments. This research provides a comparative analysis of two SLAM algorithms, Gmapping and Cartographer, evaluating their mapping performance across diverse environments from multiple dimensions. To facilitate this comparison, a mobile handling robot equipped with various sensors was designed and constructed. Mapping experiments were conducted in both a simplified laboratory setting and a complex warehouse environment using the 3D simulation tool Gazebo and the visualization tool Rviz on the ROS platform. The performance of the two algorithms was assessed based on several parameters, including map jaggedness, boundary omissions, mapping duration, and CPU usage. The results demonstrate that the Cartographer algorithm produces smoother and more accurate maps in complex environments compared to the Gmapping algorithm, with jaggedness accounting for 19% of the overall map and boundary omissions at approximately 14%. However, it requires slightly more computational resources and time than the Gmapping algorithm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icemce64157.2024.10862360
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on 2D Mapping for Mobile Transport Robots Based on SLAM

Lianghong Li, Qingzhu Zhang, Liang Zhang, Bing Li et al.
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Research on 2D Mapping for Mobile Transport Robots Based on SLAM

Lianghong Li, Qingzhu Zhang, Liang Zhang, Bing Li, Yang Shen, Chenghao Liao
article en

Abstract

Many existing studies predominantly focus on the performance of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms within single environments. This research provides a comparative analysis of two SLAM algorithms, Gmapping and Cartographer, evaluating their mapping performance across diverse environments from multiple dimensions. To facilitate this comparison, a mobile handling robot equipped with various sensors was designed and constructed. Mapping experiments were conducted in both a simplified laboratory setting and a complex warehouse environment using the 3D simulation tool Gazebo and the visualization tool Rviz on the ROS platform. The performance of the two algorithms was assessed based on several parameters, including map jaggedness, boundary omissions, mapping duration, and CPU usage. The results demonstrate that the Cartographer algorithm produces smoother and more accurate maps in complex environments compared to the Gmapping algorithm, with jaggedness accounting for 19% of the overall map and boundary omissions at approximately 14%. However, it requires slightly more computational resources and time than the Gmapping algorithm.

Huzhou Normal University (CN), Changzhou Academy of Intelli-Ag Equipment (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on 2D Mapping for Mobile Transport Robots Based on SLAM — Lianghong Li, Qingzhu Zhang, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS