Similarities, Differences, and Best Practices across Real Estate Education Programs in the United States

This study examined the similarities and differences among university-level real estate education programs in the United States, emphasizing how diverse academic disciplines prepared students to meet industry demands. Semi-structured interviews with academic leaders highlighted both the unique characteristics of different disciplines and their convergence on core competencies. Regardless of whether programs were housed in business, architecture, or urban planning schools, all programs emphasized the importance of financial analysis, market assessment, and communication skills. Additionally, industry feedback played a key role in shaping curricula, ensuring that graduates possessed the technical and interpersonal skills necessary for a rapidly evolving market. The integration of experiential learning opportunities, such as internships, case competitions, and project-based learning, further enhanced students’ preparedness for professional practice. The findings suggested that, despite differences in program focus, there was growing alignment across disciplines to meet the evolving needs of the real estate industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15214842.2025.2454710
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Similarities, Differences, and Best Practices across Real Estate Education Programs in the United States

Spenser Robinson, Dustin C. Read, Mariya Letdin
2 citations
Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
article

Similarities, Differences, and Best Practices across Real Estate Education Programs in the United States

Spenser Robinson, Dustin C. Read, Mariya Letdin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examined the similarities and differences among university-level real estate education programs in the United States, emphasizing how diverse academic disciplines prepared students to meet industry demands. Semi-structured interviews with academic leaders highlighted both the unique characteristics of different disciplines and their convergence on core competencies. Regardless of whether programs were housed in business, architecture, or urban planning schools, all programs emphasized the importance of financial analysis, market assessment, and communication skills. Additionally, industry feedback played a key role in shaping curricula, ensuring that graduates possessed the technical and interpersonal skills necessary for a rapidly evolving market. The integration of experiential learning opportunities, such as internships, case competitions, and project-based learning, further enhanced students’ preparedness for professional practice. The findings suggested that, despite differences in program focus, there was growing alignment across disciplines to meet the evolving needs of the real estate industry.

Journal of Real Estate Practice and EducationVol. 27(1)
Florida State University (US), Central Michigan University (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.