AI metrics and policymaking: assumptions and challenges in the shaping of AI

Abstract This paper explores the interplay between AI metrics and policymaking by examining the conceptual and methodological frameworks of global AI metrics and their alignment with National Artificial Intelligence Strategies (NAIS). Through topic modeling and qualitative content analysis, key thematic areas in NAIS are identified. The findings suggest a misalignment between the technical and economic focus of global AI metrics and the broader societal and ethical priorities emphasized in NAIS. This highlights the need to recalibrate AI evaluation frameworks to include ethical and other social considerations, aligning AI advancements with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for an inclusive, ethical, and sustainable future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02181-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI metrics and policymaking: assumptions and challenges in the shaping of AI

Aristotle Tympas, Konstantinos Sioumalas-Christodoulou
4 citations
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
article

AI metrics and policymaking: assumptions and challenges in the shaping of AI

Aristotle Tympas, Konstantinos Sioumalas-Christodoulou
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the interplay between AI metrics and policymaking by examining the conceptual and methodological frameworks of global AI metrics and their alignment with National Artificial Intelligence Strategies (NAIS). Through topic modeling and qualitative content analysis, key thematic areas in NAIS are identified. The findings suggest a misalignment between the technical and economic focus of global AI metrics and the broader societal and ethical priorities emphasized in NAIS. This highlights the need to recalibrate AI evaluation frameworks to include ethical and other social considerations, aligning AI advancements with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for an inclusive, ethical, and sustainable future.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(6)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link, European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
9.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.