How to conduct a meta-analysis in hand surgery. Part II: heterogeneity and publication bias

This is the second part of a two-part article on pitfalls in meta-analysis in hand surgery. The purpose of this second part is to introduce the concepts of heterogeneity and publication bias and to describe how these problems should be analysed and addressed when conducting meta-analyses in hand surgery. Statistical heterogeneity, which occurs when the variability in the observed effect cannot be explained by sampling variability alone, may be caused by clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity or both. A common error in hand surgery meta-analyses is the failure to adequately investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity is also associated with publication bias. Understanding heterogeneity in published meta-analyses would help in the understanding of the available evidence in Hand Surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934251317837
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to conduct a meta-analysis in hand surgery. Part II: heterogeneity and publication bias

Mike Ruettermann, Roberto S. Rosales
2 citations
Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
4.01
article

How to conduct a meta-analysis in hand surgery. Part II: heterogeneity and publication bias

Mike Ruettermann, Roberto S. Rosales
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This is the second part of a two-part article on pitfalls in meta-analysis in hand surgery. The purpose of this second part is to introduce the concepts of heterogeneity and publication bias and to describe how these problems should be analysed and addressed when conducting meta-analyses in hand surgery. Statistical heterogeneity, which occurs when the variability in the observed effect cannot be explained by sampling variability alone, may be caused by clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity or both. A common error in hand surgery meta-analyses is the failure to adequately investigate the sources of heterogeneity. Heterogeneity is also associated with publication bias. Understanding heterogeneity in published meta-analyses would help in the understanding of the available evidence in Hand Surgery.

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)Vol. 50(8)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Universidad de La Laguna (ES), Klinikum Oldenburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
4.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to conduct a meta-analysis in hand surgery. Part II: heterogeneity and publication bias — Mike Ruettermann, Roberto S. Rosales · Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS