Math Sorting: Unintended Consequences of Developmental Education Reforms in Community Colleges

Abstract Beginning in 2019, California community colleges were required to use multiple measures to determine students’ placement into initial math courses. Community colleges also created structured BSTEM and liberal arts (SLAM) math pathways beginning in 2017. This contemporaneous implementation could reproduce racialized stratification in math course-taking. This study analyzes changes in math course-taking between Fall 2017 and Summer 2021 using multinomial logistic regression. We find that after the reforms, fewer students across racial/ethnic groups took developmental math and more students attempted SLAM and BSTEM math in the first year of enrollment. Students of color were more likely to take SLAM math and slightly less likely to take BSTEM math, even among academically prepared students. We find some evidence of racial tracking in the steeper increase in SLAM course-taking among Latina/o/x students compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We discuss implications for future policy and practice given these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Higher Education
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-025-09834-w
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Math Sorting: Unintended Consequences of Developmental Education Reforms in Community Colleges

Soumya Mishra, Elise Swanson, Elif Özata Yücel, Federick Ngo et al.
Research in Higher Education
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Math Sorting: Unintended Consequences of Developmental Education Reforms in Community Colleges

Soumya Mishra, Elise Swanson, Elif Özata Yücel, Federick Ngo, Tatiana Melguizo, Cheryl D. Ching
article en

Abstract

Abstract Beginning in 2019, California community colleges were required to use multiple measures to determine students’ placement into initial math courses. Community colleges also created structured BSTEM and liberal arts (SLAM) math pathways beginning in 2017. This contemporaneous implementation could reproduce racialized stratification in math course-taking. This study analyzes changes in math course-taking between Fall 2017 and Summer 2021 using multinomial logistic regression. We find that after the reforms, fewer students across racial/ethnic groups took developmental math and more students attempted SLAM and BSTEM math in the first year of enrollment. Students of color were more likely to take SLAM math and slightly less likely to take BSTEM math, even among academically prepared students. We find some evidence of racial tracking in the steeper increase in SLAM course-taking among Latina/o/x students compared to other racial/ethnic groups. We discuss implications for future policy and practice given these results.

Research in Higher EducationVol. 66(2)
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US), Harvard University Press (US), Center For Policy Research (US)
Spencer Foundation, University of Southern California
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.