Charting the landscape of rail human factors and automation: A systematic scoping review

• Human factors research shows disperse objectives and lack of methodological harmony. • Policy makers should encourage integration of human factors research in rail domain. • Research priorities are the impact of automation on driver performance and workload. • Research on automation in railway traffic control centers is limited. • Human-in-the-loop simulation is a powerful participatory method. As railway systems in Europe move towards increased integration and automation, understanding the human factors implications is critical. This systematic scoping review examines research on human factors and automation in railways, with a focus on studies involving railway operators such as train drivers and traffic controllers. Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we explored six databases and solicited expert recommendations, identifying 65 relevant studies published since 2000. Studies were categorized based on methodology and analysed to identify key themes, measures, and research priorities. The review revealed five main types of studies: empirical simulations (32%), non-simulation studies (25%), literature reviews (8%), analysis of existing technologies (31%), and new technologies (20%). Key research priorities included assessing the impact of automation on operator performance, workload, and situational awareness. Human-in-the-loop simulations emerged as a crucial method for evaluating new automated systems. Nevertheless, gaps emerged, e.g., studies focus mainly on drivers, use small sample sizes, and pay little attention to operators’ communications. Moreover, researchers seem to have scattered goals and assessment practices, with limited cross-contamination among different centres and across domains. If the goal is to integrate the European rail network, policymakers should push not only for technological integration but also for cultural and methodological integration, in which human factors can play a pivotal role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Charting the landscape of rail human factors and automation: A systematic scoping review

Simone Borsci, Sarah A. Kusumastuti, Julia Lo, Tom H.J. Kolkman
2 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
article

Charting the landscape of rail human factors and automation: A systematic scoping review

Simone Borsci, Sarah A. Kusumastuti, Julia Lo, Tom H.J. Kolkman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Human factors research shows disperse objectives and lack of methodological harmony. • Policy makers should encourage integration of human factors research in rail domain. • Research priorities are the impact of automation on driver performance and workload. • Research on automation in railway traffic control centers is limited. • Human-in-the-loop simulation is a powerful participatory method. As railway systems in Europe move towards increased integration and automation, understanding the human factors implications is critical. This systematic scoping review examines research on human factors and automation in railways, with a focus on studies involving railway operators such as train drivers and traffic controllers. Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we explored six databases and solicited expert recommendations, identifying 65 relevant studies published since 2000. Studies were categorized based on methodology and analysed to identify key themes, measures, and research priorities. The review revealed five main types of studies: empirical simulations (32%), non-simulation studies (25%), literature reviews (8%), analysis of existing technologies (31%), and new technologies (20%). Key research priorities included assessing the impact of automation on operator performance, workload, and situational awareness. Human-in-the-loop simulations emerged as a crucial method for evaluating new automated systems. Nevertheless, gaps emerged, e.g., studies focus mainly on drivers, use small sample sizes, and pay little attention to operators’ communications. Moreover, researchers seem to have scattered goals and assessment practices, with limited cross-contamination among different centres and across domains. If the goal is to integrate the European rail network, policymakers should push not only for technological integration but also for cultural and methodological integration, in which human factors can play a pivotal role.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 30
Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde (NL), St Mary's Hospital (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB), University of Twente (NL)
European Commission, Technische Universiteit Delft
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.