Working towards an environmentally sustainable and equitable future? New evidence on green jobs from linked administrative data in the UK

Given the urgency of the transition to net-zero, there is a need for a robust evidence base to support an environmentally sustainable and equitable economy. Employing a linked administrative dataset and using both cross sectional and panel estimation techniques, this study examines employment opportunities and estimates the economic benefits of working in green occupations. Consistent with social role theory, the results indicate that individuals are more likely to work in green occupations if they are white, male, full-time, not represented by a collective agreement, and work for a small or foreign owned business. Contributing to the international literature on pay in green jobs, the study reports a pay premium of four percent after controlling for other factors. Employees covered by collective agreements receive additional pay benefits, yet representation is less prevalent in directly green occupations. In line with research into attitude-behaviour gaps, the study demonstrates that while personal travel behaviours and green employment choices are often inconsistent, when they align this yields a pay dividend. The research makes an important and novel contribution by showing that green employment can partially mitigate inter-occupation pay gaps, while identifying that persistent gender and ethnic pay disparities remain within green occupations. Females appear particularly disadvantaged by domestic and childcare responsibilities. This study also reports sector effects, with more traditional industries such as manufacturing and construction exhibiting entrenched gender biases. The results highlight the need to integrate considerations of inequality into theoretical frameworks that aim to understand and conceptualise the uptake of green jobs. • Females and non-white workers are underrepresented in green occupations. • Salaried workers, fulltime employees, those working in smaller business and for foreign owned companies are more likely to work in a green job. • There is a pay premium for working in green occupations. • Working in a green occupation can offset some of the inter-occupation gender and ethnic pay gap. • In line with social role theory, within green occupations, gender and ethnic pay gaps persist. • In line with attitude-behaviour gaps, evidence suggests that personal travel behaviours and green employment choices are not consistent, yet when they are there is a pay dividend.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145025
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Working towards an environmentally sustainable and equitable future? New evidence on green jobs from linked administrative data in the UK

P.A. Bradley, Damian Whittard, Van Phuoc Phan, Felix Ritchie
3 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
article

Working towards an environmentally sustainable and equitable future? New evidence on green jobs from linked administrative data in the UK

P.A. Bradley, Damian Whittard, Van Phuoc Phan, Felix Ritchie
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Given the urgency of the transition to net-zero, there is a need for a robust evidence base to support an environmentally sustainable and equitable economy. Employing a linked administrative dataset and using both cross sectional and panel estimation techniques, this study examines employment opportunities and estimates the economic benefits of working in green occupations. Consistent with social role theory, the results indicate that individuals are more likely to work in green occupations if they are white, male, full-time, not represented by a collective agreement, and work for a small or foreign owned business. Contributing to the international literature on pay in green jobs, the study reports a pay premium of four percent after controlling for other factors. Employees covered by collective agreements receive additional pay benefits, yet representation is less prevalent in directly green occupations. In line with research into attitude-behaviour gaps, the study demonstrates that while personal travel behaviours and green employment choices are often inconsistent, when they align this yields a pay dividend. The research makes an important and novel contribution by showing that green employment can partially mitigate inter-occupation pay gaps, while identifying that persistent gender and ethnic pay disparities remain within green occupations. Females appear particularly disadvantaged by domestic and childcare responsibilities. This study also reports sector effects, with more traditional industries such as manufacturing and construction exhibiting entrenched gender biases. The results highlight the need to integrate considerations of inequality into theoretical frameworks that aim to understand and conceptualise the uptake of green jobs. • Females and non-white workers are underrepresented in green occupations. • Salaried workers, fulltime employees, those working in smaller business and for foreign owned companies are more likely to work in a green job. • There is a pay premium for working in green occupations. • Working in a green occupation can offset some of the inter-occupation gender and ethnic pay gap. • In line with social role theory, within green occupations, gender and ethnic pay gaps persist. • In line with attitude-behaviour gaps, evidence suggests that personal travel behaviours and green employment choices are not consistent, yet when they are there is a pay dividend.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 494
University of the West of England (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.