Tomato responses to nitrogen, drought and combined stresses: Shared and specific effects on vascular plant anatomy, nutrient partitioning and amino acids profile

Crops are often subjected to various abiotic stresses and interactions between them may occur, but how plants cope with them remains poorly understood. This study explored how combined nitrogen and drought stress impact tomato vascular stem anatomy, nutrient partitioning and amino acids profile. Tomato seedlings were exposed to control (CTR; 100N + 100%W), N stress (N; 50%N), drought stress (W; 50%W), or combined stress (N + W; 50%N+50%W) for 27 days. All treatments similarly reduced the phloem and xylem areas. Plants under N + W stress exhibited increased root synthesis of asparagine and arginine (up to 230% compared to W stress and 66% compared to N stress) and showed a higher reallocation and synthesis of osmolytes such as K<sup>+</sup> and proline, respectively. This, along with the specific increase in other amino acids related to osmoregulation (alanine, tyrosine and phenylalanine), contributed to an enhanced stomatal closure and lower transpiration rate compared to W stressed plants. Conversely, N stressed plants responded mainly through N remobilization from the photosynthetic machinery, leading to decreased chlorophyll content (up to 32%) and photosynthetic rate (up to 57%). Under single W stress, plants invested more in the root system as a strategy to increase W and nutrients' uptake, compared to those grown under N + W stress, and maintained the photosynthetic rate at the level of CTR plants. It is concluded that tomato plants employed distinct mechanisms for reallocating nitrogen and regulating osmosis to withstand either single or combined stresses and that amino acids and nutrients' homeostasis have an important role in these processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109649
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tomato responses to nitrogen, drought and combined stresses: Shared and specific effects on vascular plant anatomy, nutrient partitioning and amino acids profile

S.M.P. Carvalho, Boris Bokor, A Kokavcová, A.P.G. Fernandes et al.
7 citations
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
12.25
article

Tomato responses to nitrogen, drought and combined stresses: Shared and specific effects on vascular plant anatomy, nutrient partitioning and amino acids profile

S.M.P. Carvalho, Boris Bokor, A Kokavcová, A.P.G. Fernandes, Dominik Kostoláni, Marek Vaculík, E. Heuvelink, Joana Machado, Marta W. Vasconcelos
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Crops are often subjected to various abiotic stresses and interactions between them may occur, but how plants cope with them remains poorly understood. This study explored how combined nitrogen and drought stress impact tomato vascular stem anatomy, nutrient partitioning and amino acids profile. Tomato seedlings were exposed to control (CTR; 100N + 100%W), N stress (N; 50%N), drought stress (W; 50%W), or combined stress (N + W; 50%N+50%W) for 27 days. All treatments similarly reduced the phloem and xylem areas. Plants under N + W stress exhibited increased root synthesis of asparagine and arginine (up to 230% compared to W stress and 66% compared to N stress) and showed a higher reallocation and synthesis of osmolytes such as K<sup>+</sup> and proline, respectively. This, along with the specific increase in other amino acids related to osmoregulation (alanine, tyrosine and phenylalanine), contributed to an enhanced stomatal closure and lower transpiration rate compared to W stressed plants. Conversely, N stressed plants responded mainly through N remobilization from the photosynthetic machinery, leading to decreased chlorophyll content (up to 32%) and photosynthetic rate (up to 57%). Under single W stress, plants invested more in the root system as a strategy to increase W and nutrients' uptake, compared to those grown under N + W stress, and maintained the photosynthetic rate at the level of CTR plants. It is concluded that tomato plants employed distinct mechanisms for reallocating nitrogen and regulating osmosis to withstand either single or combined stresses and that amino acids and nutrients' homeostasis have an important role in these processes.

Plant Physiology and BiochemistryVol. 221
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Graduate School Experimental Plant Sciences (NL), Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Agrupamento de Escolas Nuno Álvares (PT), Comenius University Bratislava (SK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, European Regional Development Fund
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
12.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.