An Experimental Analysis of Empathy: Comparing Animal and Human Responses to Emotional Distress

This study seeks to elaborate on the emotional response of humans towards other humans and animals. In these circumstances, a video presentation has been utilized as the source of the specific details that will be used in an assessment to be answered by the participants. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the study, 20 college students were carefully selected. These participants were screened to exclude individuals with a history of traumatic experiences involving animals or humans, minimizing potential biases that could influence their emotional responses. A paired sample t-test was utilized since the researchers used a within-subject design. The p-value of 0.001 is below the threshold of 0.05. This signifies a statistically significant difference in empathy scores between the two groups, with participants exhibiting greater empathy towards animals than humans, as indicated by the positive t-statistic. Based on these findings, the null hypothesis was rejected, stating no difference in empathy scores between humans and animals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Human Psychology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54536/ajhp.v3i1.4391
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Experimental Analysis of Empathy: Comparing Animal and Human Responses to Emotional Distress

Claire Lynn B. Culajara, Hanah Bianca B. Dacillo, Samantha A. Camacho, Danzel Dave V. Tamara
American Journal of Human Psychology
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
article

An Experimental Analysis of Empathy: Comparing Animal and Human Responses to Emotional Distress

Claire Lynn B. Culajara, Hanah Bianca B. Dacillo, Samantha A. Camacho, Danzel Dave V. Tamara
article en

Abstract

This study seeks to elaborate on the emotional response of humans towards other humans and animals. In these circumstances, a video presentation has been utilized as the source of the specific details that will be used in an assessment to be answered by the participants. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the study, 20 college students were carefully selected. These participants were screened to exclude individuals with a history of traumatic experiences involving animals or humans, minimizing potential biases that could influence their emotional responses. A paired sample t-test was utilized since the researchers used a within-subject design. The p-value of 0.001 is below the threshold of 0.05. This signifies a statistically significant difference in empathy scores between the two groups, with participants exhibiting greater empathy towards animals than humans, as indicated by the positive t-statistic. Based on these findings, the null hypothesis was rejected, stating no difference in empathy scores between humans and animals.

American Journal of Human PsychologyVol. 3(1)
University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.