Picturing plankton: Complementing net‐based plankton community assessments with optical imaging across diverse marine environments

Abstract In recent years, optical imaging has emerged as a promising tool for in situ observations of plankton. In this study, we aimed to compare the plankton community estimates obtained from a Video Plankton Recorder (VPR) imaging device with net‐based approaches. By collecting VPR and net samples in clear waters with large‐sized plankton and eutrophic waters with small‐sized plankton, spatial and temporal patterns in plankton densities and community composition were compared. Furthermore, it allowed the evaluation of the performance of imaging methods under diverse hydrographic conditions. We observed pronounced spatial differences in density estimates. In the eutrophic site, the WP2 net densities consistently surpassed those from a VPR, while in the clear water site the observed densities of the VPR and a MultiNet were more similar. Variations in water column turbidity, plankton body size, plankton nets and their mesh size, and the total sampled water volume were found to likely play a role in the observed inconsistencies between the sampling sites. The results suggested that a VPR is particularly well‐suited for use in clear waters inhabited by large‐sized plankton. The VPR demonstrated potential in enhancing density estimates of fragile ( Phaeocystis ) and gelatinous taxa (Cnidaria and Ctenophora) in specific environments being non‐invasive. Overall, the VPR and other optical imaging devices show valuable insights into zooplankton ecology and distribution, complementing density estimates of traditional net sampling methods, and enhancing our understanding of the role of zooplankton in marine ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10674
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Picturing plankton: Complementing net‐based plankton community assessments with optical imaging across diverse marine environments

Pascal I. Hablützel, Lorenz Meire, Leandro Ponsoni, Cedric Goossens et al.
1 citations
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Marine and coastal ecosystems
1.79
article

Picturing plankton: Complementing net‐based plankton community assessments with optical imaging across diverse marine environments

Pascal I. Hablützel, Lorenz Meire, Leandro Ponsoni, Cedric Goossens, Klaas Deneudt, Marleen De Troch, Wieter Boone, Klas Ove Möller, Jonas Mortelmans, Roeland Develter, Anouk Ollevier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, optical imaging has emerged as a promising tool for in situ observations of plankton. In this study, we aimed to compare the plankton community estimates obtained from a Video Plankton Recorder (VPR) imaging device with net‐based approaches. By collecting VPR and net samples in clear waters with large‐sized plankton and eutrophic waters with small‐sized plankton, spatial and temporal patterns in plankton densities and community composition were compared. Furthermore, it allowed the evaluation of the performance of imaging methods under diverse hydrographic conditions. We observed pronounced spatial differences in density estimates. In the eutrophic site, the WP2 net densities consistently surpassed those from a VPR, while in the clear water site the observed densities of the VPR and a MultiNet were more similar. Variations in water column turbidity, plankton body size, plankton nets and their mesh size, and the total sampled water volume were found to likely play a role in the observed inconsistencies between the sampling sites. The results suggested that a VPR is particularly well‐suited for use in clear waters inhabited by large‐sized plankton. The VPR demonstrated potential in enhancing density estimates of fragile ( Phaeocystis ) and gelatinous taxa (Cnidaria and Ctenophora) in specific environments being non‐invasive. Overall, the VPR and other optical imaging devices show valuable insights into zooplankton ecology and distribution, complementing density estimates of traditional net sampling methods, and enhancing our understanding of the role of zooplankton in marine ecosystems.

Limnology and Oceanography MethodsVol. 23(4)
HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts (BE), Flanders Marine Institute (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), Utrecht University (NL), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NL), Grønlands Naturinstitut (GL), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE)
Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee, European Commission, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der Zee, LifeWatch – Niclas Öberg Foundation, Vlaamse regering, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.