Optimising registrar research supervision: Quality, conflict management and best practices

Completing a Master of Medicine (MMed) research assignment involves both financial and time commitments. In addition, it requires considerable collaboration among supervisors, registrars, research coordinators, assistants, nurses, and patients. Substantial professional effort is necessary for developing the research concept, reviewing relevant literature, formulating a research question, and designing an appropriate methodology. From this perspective, we reflect on a clinical research supervision workshop that focuses on establishing robust supervision and conflict management practices. The workshop aimed to enhance supervision capacity for MMed research, guiding students in scientific rigour and methodology. By addressing this need, we hope to improve research quality across South African faculties and develop a new generation of skilled clinician-researchers. Clinicians as supervisors, play a pivotal role in guiding students through their academic and professional journeys. Best practices include fostering open communication, setting clear expectations, and providing consistent feedback. Institutional support is crucial, offering resources and training to enhance supervisory skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/jcmsa.v3i1.167
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising registrar research supervision: Quality, conflict management and best practices

Jeanne Lübbe, Marilize Burger, Jacques du Toit, Adetayo Emmanuel Obasa et al.
Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Optimising registrar research supervision: Quality, conflict management and best practices

Jeanne Lübbe, Marilize Burger, Jacques du Toit, Adetayo Emmanuel Obasa, Lizelle van Wyk, Ts’epo Motsohi
article en

Abstract

Completing a Master of Medicine (MMed) research assignment involves both financial and time commitments. In addition, it requires considerable collaboration among supervisors, registrars, research coordinators, assistants, nurses, and patients. Substantial professional effort is necessary for developing the research concept, reviewing relevant literature, formulating a research question, and designing an appropriate methodology. From this perspective, we reflect on a clinical research supervision workshop that focuses on establishing robust supervision and conflict management practices. The workshop aimed to enhance supervision capacity for MMed research, guiding students in scientific rigour and methodology. By addressing this need, we hope to improve research quality across South African faculties and develop a new generation of skilled clinician-researchers. Clinicians as supervisors, play a pivotal role in guiding students through their academic and professional journeys. Best practices include fostering open communication, setting clear expectations, and providing consistent feedback. Institutional support is crucial, offering resources and training to enhance supervisory skills.

Journal of the Colleges of Medicine of South AfricaVol. 3(1)
Western Cape Department of Health (ZA), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.