Housebuilders’ landbanks: Inventory, asset or hoard?

In the context of longstanding allegations of land hoarding and/or speculation, this paper examines the land holdings of major housebuilders. The paper discusses the concept of landbanking and potential motives for and consequences of holding land inventories. Through a descriptive analysis of quantitative, temporal data of the landbanks of leading, listed housebuilders, the paper analyses the land holdings of residential developers in both the US and UK. The analysis encompasses various aspects including the relative scale of their land holdings, the extent of land ownership compared to control (typically through options) and the evolution of these patterns over time. It is found that the main motives for holding significant land inventories could be operational, investment or anti-competitive but that holding land also comes with opportunity costs and risks. Despite operating in a highly imperfect land market and restrictive planning regime, the large UK housebuilders have been able to maintain significant and relatively stable landbanks. In comparison, the US has seen a major shift towards land-light strategies. US housebuilders increasingly rely upon relatively short-term options, rather than outright land ownership, to secure their pipeline of development plots. The shift primarily aims to hedge risks associated with holding land. Although the comparative evidence is limited and imperfect, it generally indicates that UK housebuilders tend to maintain smaller land inventories compared to their counterparts in the US, Australia, and Ireland. • Argues that housebuilders’ motives for holding landbanks should not be conflated with the consequences. • Finds that the size of UK housebuilders’ landbanks has tended to be stable and closely linked to their housing completions. • Identifies a significant structural shift towards 'land-light' strategies by the leading US housebuilders. • Concludes that there is evidence of vertical integration with housebuilders acquiring land development and promotion firms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Use Policy
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107503
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Housebuilders’ landbanks: Inventory, asset or hoard?

Pat McAllister
Land Use Policy
Housing Market and Economics
article

Housebuilders’ landbanks: Inventory, asset or hoard?

Pat McAllister
article en

Abstract

In the context of longstanding allegations of land hoarding and/or speculation, this paper examines the land holdings of major housebuilders. The paper discusses the concept of landbanking and potential motives for and consequences of holding land inventories. Through a descriptive analysis of quantitative, temporal data of the landbanks of leading, listed housebuilders, the paper analyses the land holdings of residential developers in both the US and UK. The analysis encompasses various aspects including the relative scale of their land holdings, the extent of land ownership compared to control (typically through options) and the evolution of these patterns over time. It is found that the main motives for holding significant land inventories could be operational, investment or anti-competitive but that holding land also comes with opportunity costs and risks. Despite operating in a highly imperfect land market and restrictive planning regime, the large UK housebuilders have been able to maintain significant and relatively stable landbanks. In comparison, the US has seen a major shift towards land-light strategies. US housebuilders increasingly rely upon relatively short-term options, rather than outright land ownership, to secure their pipeline of development plots. The shift primarily aims to hedge risks associated with holding land. Although the comparative evidence is limited and imperfect, it generally indicates that UK housebuilders tend to maintain smaller land inventories compared to their counterparts in the US, Australia, and Ireland. • Argues that housebuilders’ motives for holding landbanks should not be conflated with the consequences. • Finds that the size of UK housebuilders’ landbanks has tended to be stable and closely linked to their housing completions. • Identifies a significant structural shift towards 'land-light' strategies by the leading US housebuilders. • Concludes that there is evidence of vertical integration with housebuilders acquiring land development and promotion firms.

Land Use PolicyVol. 152
University of Reading (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Housing Market and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.