Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference

Carbon labelling of food products serves as a demand-side tool with the potential to drive the essential shift in consumption patterns toward reducing climate impact. For carbon labels to influence food choices, they must enable consumers to recognize and adopt purchasing behaviour that lower their climate footprint. While inference plays a critical role in facilitating behavioural change, evidence remains sparse regarding how specific characteristics of carbon labels affect consumers' ability to accurately identify low-carbon products. This study investigates how different carbon labels affect consumers’ efficiency in identifying low-carbon-emitting food products. Three labels are evaluated: (i) ‘ Digit’ specifies the amount of CO 2 e-emissions from the production of the product, (ii) ‘ Colour-Coded ’ label indicates the overall climate impact from A to E, (iii) ‘ Logo’ identifies the lowest-emitting products within each product category. Respondents in a survey in the United Kingdom were asked to identify the lowest-emitting food product in a set of tasks. All labels improved accuracy in the tasks when products from the same food category were included. Importantly, in the tasks that included products from different categories, the Digit outperformed both the Colour-Coded and the Logo labels. Notably, the Logo did not improve accuracy compared to no-label tasks. It is important that a carbon label informs about the overall climate impact rather than the within-category performance, should the label help consumers identify changes that contribute to significant reductions in climate impact. • Consumer accuracy in identifying lowest carbon-emitting food product is investigated. • Carbon label design affects accuracy in identifying lowest emitting products. • All labels improve accuracy within food categories. • Descriptive label superior when products from different categories are evaluated simultaneously. • Evaluative label that indicates overall performance superior to best-in-class logo. • Best-in-class logo is the least liked type of carbon label.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145020
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference

Anna Kristina Edenbrandt, Jonas Nordström, Daniele Asioli
9 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
15.45
article

Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference

Anna Kristina Edenbrandt, Jonas Nordström, Daniele Asioli
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Carbon labelling of food products serves as a demand-side tool with the potential to drive the essential shift in consumption patterns toward reducing climate impact. For carbon labels to influence food choices, they must enable consumers to recognize and adopt purchasing behaviour that lower their climate footprint. While inference plays a critical role in facilitating behavioural change, evidence remains sparse regarding how specific characteristics of carbon labels affect consumers' ability to accurately identify low-carbon products. This study investigates how different carbon labels affect consumers’ efficiency in identifying low-carbon-emitting food products. Three labels are evaluated: (i) ‘ Digit’ specifies the amount of CO 2 e-emissions from the production of the product, (ii) ‘ Colour-Coded ’ label indicates the overall climate impact from A to E, (iii) ‘ Logo’ identifies the lowest-emitting products within each product category. Respondents in a survey in the United Kingdom were asked to identify the lowest-emitting food product in a set of tasks. All labels improved accuracy in the tasks when products from the same food category were included. Importantly, in the tasks that included products from different categories, the Digit outperformed both the Colour-Coded and the Logo labels. Notably, the Logo did not improve accuracy compared to no-label tasks. It is important that a carbon label informs about the overall climate impact rather than the within-category performance, should the label help consumers identify changes that contribute to significant reductions in climate impact. • Consumer accuracy in identifying lowest carbon-emitting food product is investigated. • Carbon label design affects accuracy in identifying lowest emitting products. • All labels improve accuracy within food categories. • Descriptive label superior when products from different categories are evaluated simultaneously. • Evaluative label that indicates overall performance superior to best-in-class logo. • Best-in-class logo is the least liked type of carbon label.

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 494
Dalarna University (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), University of Reading (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
15.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.