An optimal sample size index for updating spatial soil models

• We proposed an index to balance model performance and sampling cost. • This index is the Optimal Sample Size Index or OSSI. • OSSI led to up to 92 % reduction in relative sampling costs for soil maps. • OSSI reduced sample size needed for quality soil maps at a constant scale. • OSSI is a flexible metric that can accommodate various modeling scenarios. Soil map updates can be expensive due to soil sampling and analysis costs. This study introduces the Optimal Sample Size Index (OSSI), a flexible framework for digital soil mapping that balances model accuracy and sampling costs to update soil spatial models. OSSI determines optimal sample size from subsets of initially available training sets, accounting for different physiographies and model validation metrics with adjustable weights, including root-mean-square-error (RMSE) for cross-validation (CV) and RMSE for independent validation, the standard deviation of RMSE values from 10-fold CV, and relative sampling cost. Relative sampling cost represents the proportion of the number of samples used in modeling to the initially available sample size. We applied two OSSI scenarios to address limitations of the original approach, which prioritized cost reduction but occasionally resulted in unreliable models due to very small training sizes. By adjusting metrics and weights, the second scenario accounted for model uncertainty, producing more reliable models with sample sizes considerably lower than full training sets. Four soil properties (pH, clay, silt, and sand %) were spatially modeled for surface soils in three study areas in Iowa, USA, using random forest regressors. Both scenarios reduced relative sampling costs by up to 92 % compared to using all samples while maintaining similar or improved model performance. The second scenario further ensured model reliability, as shown by lower standard deviations of CV-RMSE values. Our results demonstrate OSSI’s flexibility to balance cost, accuracy, and reliability, offering a practical solution for optimizing soil sample sizes and updating soil survey maps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoderma
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117208
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An optimal sample size index for updating spatial soil models

Bradley A. Miller, Caner Ferhatoglu, Marshall D. McDaniel, Wei Chen
4 citations
Geoderma
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
article

An optimal sample size index for updating spatial soil models

Bradley A. Miller, Caner Ferhatoglu, Marshall D. McDaniel, Wei Chen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• We proposed an index to balance model performance and sampling cost. • This index is the Optimal Sample Size Index or OSSI. • OSSI led to up to 92 % reduction in relative sampling costs for soil maps. • OSSI reduced sample size needed for quality soil maps at a constant scale. • OSSI is a flexible metric that can accommodate various modeling scenarios. Soil map updates can be expensive due to soil sampling and analysis costs. This study introduces the Optimal Sample Size Index (OSSI), a flexible framework for digital soil mapping that balances model accuracy and sampling costs to update soil spatial models. OSSI determines optimal sample size from subsets of initially available training sets, accounting for different physiographies and model validation metrics with adjustable weights, including root-mean-square-error (RMSE) for cross-validation (CV) and RMSE for independent validation, the standard deviation of RMSE values from 10-fold CV, and relative sampling cost. Relative sampling cost represents the proportion of the number of samples used in modeling to the initially available sample size. We applied two OSSI scenarios to address limitations of the original approach, which prioritized cost reduction but occasionally resulted in unreliable models due to very small training sizes. By adjusting metrics and weights, the second scenario accounted for model uncertainty, producing more reliable models with sample sizes considerably lower than full training sets. Four soil properties (pH, clay, silt, and sand %) were spatially modeled for surface soils in three study areas in Iowa, USA, using random forest regressors. Both scenarios reduced relative sampling costs by up to 92 % compared to using all samples while maintaining similar or improved model performance. The second scenario further ensured model reliability, as shown by lower standard deviations of CV-RMSE values. Our results demonstrate OSSI’s flexibility to balance cost, accuracy, and reliability, offering a practical solution for optimizing soil sample sizes and updating soil survey maps.

GeodermaVol. 455
Iowa State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
3.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.