Border biosecurity interceptions for air passengers – assessing intervention methods and analytic tools

At-border interventions are a critical step along the biosecurity continuum, to measure and control the risks associated with the cross-border movement of people and goods. Air passengers are a high-volume pathway for a range of biosecurity risk materials, against which various interventions may be used (e.g., manual searches, detector dogs, x-rays, etc.). Tasmania is an island state, and its environment and industries have benefited from a low level of invasive pests due to their geographic isolation. Therefore, relatively strict at-border interventions are used to prevent the entry of new pests, including some serious invasive pests already present on mainland Australia (e.g., Queensland ( Bactrocera tryoni ) and Mediterranean ( Ceratitis capitata ) fruit fly). Using a large interception database for domestic air passengers entering the southern Australian state of Tasmania from mainland Australia, this study applies common statistical modelling tools to assess the efficacy of interventions (namely, dog detectors, and bag searches), and to identify pathway risk factors (e.g., flight origin/route). This analysis considered the effects of interventions on both voluntary declarations by passengers and also detections of undeclared risk material on passengers. The analysis also focused on biosecurity risk items generally (e.g., fruits and vegetables, meat products, cut flowers), and items that are specifically considered to be fruit-fly hosts. The results highlight that active at-border interventions and the presence of biosecurity inspectors capture a significant volume of biosecurity risk items at the border, and detector dogs have particularly strong positive effects on the rate of interceptions, particularly for items detected on passengers. Conducting bag searches also appears to increase interceptions, both by increasing the rate of items being detected and by encouraging voluntary declarations. Sensitivity analyses then test the robustness of results to modelling implementation methods and distributional assumptions. This study demonstrates how statistical modelling can provide robust insights into biosecurity interventions and risk factors along pathways, and further highlights the value of high-quality interception data resources for informing and improving biosecurity systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeoBiota
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.97.141784
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Border biosecurity interceptions for air passengers – assessing intervention methods and analytic tools

Nicholas P. Moran, Anca M. Hanea, Andrew P. Robinson
1 citations
NeoBiota
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
1.90
article

Border biosecurity interceptions for air passengers – assessing intervention methods and analytic tools

Nicholas P. Moran, Anca M. Hanea, Andrew P. Robinson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

At-border interventions are a critical step along the biosecurity continuum, to measure and control the risks associated with the cross-border movement of people and goods. Air passengers are a high-volume pathway for a range of biosecurity risk materials, against which various interventions may be used (e.g., manual searches, detector dogs, x-rays, etc.). Tasmania is an island state, and its environment and industries have benefited from a low level of invasive pests due to their geographic isolation. Therefore, relatively strict at-border interventions are used to prevent the entry of new pests, including some serious invasive pests already present on mainland Australia (e.g., Queensland ( Bactrocera tryoni ) and Mediterranean ( Ceratitis capitata ) fruit fly). Using a large interception database for domestic air passengers entering the southern Australian state of Tasmania from mainland Australia, this study applies common statistical modelling tools to assess the efficacy of interventions (namely, dog detectors, and bag searches), and to identify pathway risk factors (e.g., flight origin/route). This analysis considered the effects of interventions on both voluntary declarations by passengers and also detections of undeclared risk material on passengers. The analysis also focused on biosecurity risk items generally (e.g., fruits and vegetables, meat products, cut flowers), and items that are specifically considered to be fruit-fly hosts. The results highlight that active at-border interventions and the presence of biosecurity inspectors capture a significant volume of biosecurity risk items at the border, and detector dogs have particularly strong positive effects on the rate of interceptions, particularly for items detected on passengers. Conducting bag searches also appears to increase interceptions, both by increasing the rate of items being detected and by encouraging voluntary declarations. Sensitivity analyses then test the robustness of results to modelling implementation methods and distributional assumptions. This study demonstrates how statistical modelling can provide robust insights into biosecurity interventions and risk factors along pathways, and further highlights the value of high-quality interception data resources for informing and improving biosecurity systems.

NeoBiotaVol. 97
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
1.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.