Study on the Micro-Surfacing Properties of SBR Modified Asphalt Emulsion with Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement

With the updates and differences in the usage of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) separation technology, the production of fine-particle RAP exceeds their usage, resulting in an excess of fine-particle RAP. How to apply this excess RAP on a large scale in micro-surfacing technology has become a challenge. This study aims to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of incorporating RAP into micro-surfacing. To this end, a mix design process for RAP-containing micro-surfacing, based on the current gradation design procedure and existing research findings, is proposed. The study examines the influence of six different RAP contents, as well as the effects of SBR emulsified asphalt, added water, and RAP on the micro-surfacing mix design. Subsequently, the effects of RAP content on the pavement performance of micro-surfacing are evaluated through rutting deformation rate, wet wheel abrasion, and British pendulum tests. Finally, an economic analysis from a construction perspective is conducted. The results indicate that the optimized mix design process meets specific usage requirements and is effective for RAP-containing micro-surfacing. The mix design results show that the addition of RAP reduces the asphalt demand and mixing time of slurry mixtures. Increasing the amount of added water can meet mixing requirements, but it leads to a reduction in early strength. As the RAP content increases, skid resistance improves, with a maximum increase of 14.9%; the rutting deformation rate increases, and this is the main factor limiting the RAP content, restricting it to no more than 40%; water damage resistance shows an initial increase followed by a decrease, but this does not affect the RAP content. Therefore, the maximum RAP content is limited to 40% without the addition of other additives, mainly due to the phenomenon of weak agglomeration in RAP. Finally, cost calculations show that incorporating 40% RAP can save approximately 17% of the construction costs.