Stressed and oppressed: Insider perspectives on stress induction research with LGBTQA+ People of Color

There is a substantial body of literature on researcher and participant vulnerability and subjectivity when using qualitative research methods to work with marginalized populations, yet few resources exist for researchers conducting stress induction experiments with these groups - including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQA+) people of Color. As a result, I was unprepared for the consequences of conducting the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) with LGBTQA+ young adults of Color and the vicarious stress that I would encounter as a queer researcher of Color. In this article, I describe the process of conducting the TSST with LGBTQA+ people of Color, reporting participant experiences and feedback and describing my own experiences of inducing stress among members of an oppressed population to which I belong. Using fieldnotes from this study and the extant literature on applications of critical theory and insider research in the qualitative field, I consider possible modifications to socially evaluative stress induction methods for social justice-oriented work with oppressed populations and discuss my perspectives on disrupting positivist assertions in quantitative, psychophysiological research with LGBTQA+ people of Color.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Published
2025-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2025.107390
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stressed and oppressed: Insider perspectives on stress induction research with LGBTQA+ People of Color

Monica A. Ghabrial
1 citations
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
3.87
article

Stressed and oppressed: Insider perspectives on stress induction research with LGBTQA+ People of Color

Monica A. Ghabrial
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a substantial body of literature on researcher and participant vulnerability and subjectivity when using qualitative research methods to work with marginalized populations, yet few resources exist for researchers conducting stress induction experiments with these groups - including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, asexual, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQA+) people of Color. As a result, I was unprepared for the consequences of conducting the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) with LGBTQA+ young adults of Color and the vicarious stress that I would encounter as a queer researcher of Color. In this article, I describe the process of conducting the TSST with LGBTQA+ people of Color, reporting participant experiences and feedback and describing my own experiences of inducing stress among members of an oppressed population to which I belong. Using fieldnotes from this study and the extant literature on applications of critical theory and insider research in the qualitative field, I consider possible modifications to socially evaluative stress induction methods for social justice-oriented work with oppressed populations and discuss my perspectives on disrupting positivist assertions in quantitative, psychophysiological research with LGBTQA+ people of Color.

PsychoneuroendocrinologyVol. 174
Algoma University (CA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gender Roles and Identity Studies
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.