An efficient resistance assessment method for the porous and upright roughness arrays

Sand fences and shelterbelts are often combined to form porous and upright roughness arrays (PURAs) to mitigate soil erosion and land degradation. However, the efficient resistance assessment for these massive arrays remains unresolved. This paper develops a novel method quantifying the resistance of the PURAs using computational fluid dynamics technology, which brings the drag term and the source term in the Navier–Stokes (N–S) equations to simulate the resistance of PURAs to airflow. Then, the equivalent boundary is conducted to accurately assess the drag coefficient of PURAs. Furthermore, the computational methods for the drag coefficients specific to sand fences and shelterbelts are presented, which are regarded as the functions of the porosity, the height, the number of belts, and the spacing of these arrays. Utilizing these insights, an efficient resistance assessment method is formed, with the threshold of wind pressure required to drive to sand movement serving as the evaluation criterion. Finally, the model's performance is validated against wind tunnel test results, demonstrating good accuracy. The findings show that the combination of sand fences and shelterbelts has a higher obstructive effect and the arrangement of shelterbelts in the narrow belt with multiple strips pattern can achieve higher resistance. This resistance assessment method of the PURA is superior to enhancing the design efficiency of sand and wind control engineering in intense wind-blown sand environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0251057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Icing and De-icing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An efficient resistance assessment method for the porous and upright roughness arrays

Binbin Pei, Jie Zhang, Kan He, Yanhong Song
1 citations
Physics of Fluids
Icing and De-icing Technologies
4.99
article

An efficient resistance assessment method for the porous and upright roughness arrays

Binbin Pei, Jie Zhang, Kan He, Yanhong Song
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Sand fences and shelterbelts are often combined to form porous and upright roughness arrays (PURAs) to mitigate soil erosion and land degradation. However, the efficient resistance assessment for these massive arrays remains unresolved. This paper develops a novel method quantifying the resistance of the PURAs using computational fluid dynamics technology, which brings the drag term and the source term in the Navier–Stokes (N–S) equations to simulate the resistance of PURAs to airflow. Then, the equivalent boundary is conducted to accurately assess the drag coefficient of PURAs. Furthermore, the computational methods for the drag coefficients specific to sand fences and shelterbelts are presented, which are regarded as the functions of the porosity, the height, the number of belts, and the spacing of these arrays. Utilizing these insights, an efficient resistance assessment method is formed, with the threshold of wind pressure required to drive to sand movement serving as the evaluation criterion. Finally, the model's performance is validated against wind tunnel test results, demonstrating good accuracy. The findings show that the combination of sand fences and shelterbelts has a higher obstructive effect and the arrangement of shelterbelts in the narrow belt with multiple strips pattern can achieve higher resistance. This resistance assessment method of the PURA is superior to enhancing the design efficiency of sand and wind control engineering in intense wind-blown sand environments.

Physics of FluidsVol. 37(2)
Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Icing and De-icing Technologies
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.