Best Practices in Scenario Planning and Mapping for Salmon Recovery in the Columbia River Basin

Salmon recovery planning in the Columbia River Basin depends upon what we argue are best practices of scenario planning in social–ecological systems. We examine how resilience science informs the concepts of stability landscapes and scenario mapping, and how this fits into the current state of salmonid recovery planning. We analyze proposed “scenarios” and “perspectives” that reflect the current state of the U.S. federal planning process for salmonid recovery. We argue that only proposed “scenarios” that adhere to best practices, employ the resilience perspective, and adopt holistic social–ecological thought can be mapped onto a stability landscape. We demonstrate how such scenarios have the potential to increase insight into the viability of proposed recovery actions and avoid self-contradictory efforts stemming from a failure to see the basin-wide social–ecological system as a whole. We discuss and illustrate the potential of employing backcasting and post-normal science in terms of indigenous perspectives on salmon recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12020061
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best Practices in Scenario Planning and Mapping for Salmon Recovery in the Columbia River Basin

Gregory M. Hill, Steven A. Kolmes
Environments
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
article

Best Practices in Scenario Planning and Mapping for Salmon Recovery in the Columbia River Basin

Gregory M. Hill, Steven A. Kolmes
article en

Abstract

Salmon recovery planning in the Columbia River Basin depends upon what we argue are best practices of scenario planning in social–ecological systems. We examine how resilience science informs the concepts of stability landscapes and scenario mapping, and how this fits into the current state of salmonid recovery planning. We analyze proposed “scenarios” and “perspectives” that reflect the current state of the U.S. federal planning process for salmonid recovery. We argue that only proposed “scenarios” that adhere to best practices, employ the resilience perspective, and adopt holistic social–ecological thought can be mapped onto a stability landscape. We demonstrate how such scenarios have the potential to increase insight into the viability of proposed recovery actions and avoid self-contradictory efforts stemming from a failure to see the basin-wide social–ecological system as a whole. We discuss and illustrate the potential of employing backcasting and post-normal science in terms of indigenous perspectives on salmon recovery.

EnvironmentsVol. 12(2)
University of Portland (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.