Riconoscere le riviste predatorie

Predatory journals cannot be considered trustworthy because of their lack of transparency and scientific rigor, for example within the peer review process. This phenomenon began to spread with the advent of open access journals and takes advantage of its economic model. Since a unanimous definition of predatory journal is lacking, it is difficult for a potential author of scientific articles to distinguish predatory journals from those respectful of the internationally shared best publication practices. To do so, it is useful to know the criteria by which scholarly journals are evaluated and considered, for instance for their indexing in bibliographic and bibliometric databases. These criteria relate primarily to the content of the journal, the internal organization of the journal and its business model, and the policies adopted to ensure research integrity, and are largely or entirely absent in predatory journals: the analysis of these aspects on journal websites can be crucial in order to choose the publishing venue for the publication of one's work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Recenti Progressi in Medicina
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1701/4450.44439
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Riconoscere le riviste predatorie

Manuela Moncada
Recenti Progressi in Medicina
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

Riconoscere le riviste predatorie

Manuela Moncada
article en

Abstract

Predatory journals cannot be considered trustworthy because of their lack of transparency and scientific rigor, for example within the peer review process. This phenomenon began to spread with the advent of open access journals and takes advantage of its economic model. Since a unanimous definition of predatory journal is lacking, it is difficult for a potential author of scientific articles to distinguish predatory journals from those respectful of the internationally shared best publication practices. To do so, it is useful to know the criteria by which scholarly journals are evaluated and considered, for instance for their indexing in bibliographic and bibliometric databases. These criteria relate primarily to the content of the journal, the internal organization of the journal and its business model, and the policies adopted to ensure research integrity, and are largely or entirely absent in predatory journals: the analysis of these aspects on journal websites can be crucial in order to choose the publishing venue for the publication of one's work.

Recenti Progressi in MedicinaVol. 116(2)
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.