The influence of dolphin group coordination on cooperative foraging with humans

Social foraging is a collective solution to the challenge of catching prey. A remarkable example involving different predator species with complementary hunting skills is Lahille's bottlenose dolphins, <i>Tursiops truncatus gephyreus</i> foraging with net-casting human fishers to catch migratory mullet, <i>Mugil liza</i>. It remains unknown, however, to what extent dolphins coordinate their own actions when foraging with humans, and how intraspecific coordination impacts interspecific foraging success. Using drone-based tracking, we quantified dolphin group surfacing behaviors (diving synchrony, proximity, and heading angles between individuals) and tested the repeatability of these behavioral metrics across independent human-dolphin cooperative foraging interactions. We then quantified how the variance and consistency in these behaviors influenced the likelihood of fishers catching mullet. We found repeatable patterns in dolphin group proximity and heading angles across cooperative foraging interactions with fishers, and that fishers were more successful at catching mullet when dolphins approached them along different trajectories with consistent diving synchrony. These findings suggest that groups of dolphins can be, to some extent, coordinated when fishing with humans, thereby influencing the collective outcome of this cooperative foraging tactic. We consider hypotheses for the underlying mechanisms of synchrony and coordination within groups of dolphins and highlight solutions for overcoming the inherent challenges associated with quantifying collective foraging dynamics in natural settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Zoology
Published
2025-02-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaf008
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of dolphin group coordination on cooperative foraging with humans

Maurício Cantor, Fábio G. Daura‐Jorge, Emer Rogan, Damien R. Farine et al.
1 citations
Current Zoology
Marine animal studies overview
1.72
article

The influence of dolphin group coordination on cooperative foraging with humans

Maurício Cantor, Fábio G. Daura‐Jorge, Emer Rogan, Damien R. Farine, Alexandre M. S. Machado, Kiera McGarvey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Social foraging is a collective solution to the challenge of catching prey. A remarkable example involving different predator species with complementary hunting skills is Lahille's bottlenose dolphins, <i>Tursiops truncatus gephyreus</i> foraging with net-casting human fishers to catch migratory mullet, <i>Mugil liza</i>. It remains unknown, however, to what extent dolphins coordinate their own actions when foraging with humans, and how intraspecific coordination impacts interspecific foraging success. Using drone-based tracking, we quantified dolphin group surfacing behaviors (diving synchrony, proximity, and heading angles between individuals) and tested the repeatability of these behavioral metrics across independent human-dolphin cooperative foraging interactions. We then quantified how the variance and consistency in these behaviors influenced the likelihood of fishers catching mullet. We found repeatable patterns in dolphin group proximity and heading angles across cooperative foraging interactions with fishers, and that fishers were more successful at catching mullet when dolphins approached them along different trajectories with consistent diving synchrony. These findings suggest that groups of dolphins can be, to some extent, coordinated when fishing with humans, thereby influencing the collective outcome of this cooperative foraging tactic. We consider hypotheses for the underlying mechanisms of synchrony and coordination within groups of dolphins and highlight solutions for overcoming the inherent challenges associated with quantifying collective foraging dynamics in natural settings.

Current ZoologyVol. 71(6)
Australian National University (AU), Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Oregon State University (US), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), University College Cork (IE), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES)
Oregon State University, Université de Lausanne, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Marine animal studies overview
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.