ERGOGENIC WORDS: HOW PLACEBOS CHANGE OUR BRAIN

Abstract Background The placebo effect is an illustrative example of the mind-brain-body interaction whereby a positive physical outcome follows the administration of an inert treatment that is expected to be effective. The two main psychological determinants of the placebo effect are conscious expectations, induced through verbal suggestion, and learning, induced through classical conditioning. Accumulating behavioral data suggested that positive expectations of motor improvement result in better motor control for several motor functions in athletes, non-athletes, and patients with motor deficits. These effects have been related to changes in brain areas involved in motor planning and execution, although a deep understanding of the precise neural network underlying this complex psychobiological phenomenon is still missing. Aims and Objectives The aim of this study was to tackle the role of frontal cortical regions after placebo manipulations using, for the first time, fNIRS (functional near infrared spectroscopy). The fNIRS is a non-invasive technique used to investigate changes in the concentration of blood oxygen levels induced by brain activity, hence, oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR), at the level of cortical microcirculation blood vessels. Although not having the same spatial resolution as the fMRI, fNIRS has often been compared to fMRI due to both following the same kind of signal and recording the same activity from the cortex. Methods For this study, 30 healthy volunteers have been recruited from the student population of the University of Turin. Participants were asked to perform a force motor task and were randomly assigned to two different groups. Participants in the Placebo Group (P group) were informed that the application of 2 electrodes (actually sham) would have improved their motor performance. Participants in the Control Group (C group) performed the motor task without positive verbal information about the effectiveness of the sham electrodes. Results From a behavioral point of view, results showed that participants in the P group improved their motor performance compared with the C group (p< 0.05). Moreover, differences in HbO have been observed in the P group in different brain regions, including the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Discussion These findings bring new evidence on the neural underpinnings of the motor placebo effect, by showing that the left DLPFC may undermine the expectation-induced enhancement of motor performance in participants that expected a positive motor improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.132
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ERGOGENIC WORDS: HOW PLACEBOS CHANGE OUR BRAIN

Elisa Carlino, Giovanni Lanzo, Alessandro Piedimonte, Francesco Campaci et al.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

ERGOGENIC WORDS: HOW PLACEBOS CHANGE OUR BRAIN

Elisa Carlino, Giovanni Lanzo, Alessandro Piedimonte, Francesco Campaci, Valeria Volpino, Francesca Persiani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The placebo effect is an illustrative example of the mind-brain-body interaction whereby a positive physical outcome follows the administration of an inert treatment that is expected to be effective. The two main psychological determinants of the placebo effect are conscious expectations, induced through verbal suggestion, and learning, induced through classical conditioning. Accumulating behavioral data suggested that positive expectations of motor improvement result in better motor control for several motor functions in athletes, non-athletes, and patients with motor deficits. These effects have been related to changes in brain areas involved in motor planning and execution, although a deep understanding of the precise neural network underlying this complex psychobiological phenomenon is still missing. Aims and Objectives The aim of this study was to tackle the role of frontal cortical regions after placebo manipulations using, for the first time, fNIRS (functional near infrared spectroscopy). The fNIRS is a non-invasive technique used to investigate changes in the concentration of blood oxygen levels induced by brain activity, hence, oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HbR), at the level of cortical microcirculation blood vessels. Although not having the same spatial resolution as the fMRI, fNIRS has often been compared to fMRI due to both following the same kind of signal and recording the same activity from the cortex. Methods For this study, 30 healthy volunteers have been recruited from the student population of the University of Turin. Participants were asked to perform a force motor task and were randomly assigned to two different groups. Participants in the Placebo Group (P group) were informed that the application of 2 electrodes (actually sham) would have improved their motor performance. Participants in the Control Group (C group) performed the motor task without positive verbal information about the effectiveness of the sham electrodes. Results From a behavioral point of view, results showed that participants in the P group improved their motor performance compared with the C group (p< 0.05). Moreover, differences in HbO have been observed in the P group in different brain regions, including the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Discussion These findings bring new evidence on the neural underpinnings of the motor placebo effect, by showing that the left DLPFC may undermine the expectation-induced enhancement of motor performance in participants that expected a positive motor improvement.

The International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.