REDEFINING RECOVERY: EXPLORING ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECTS AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION WITH REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION

Abstract Background Cognitive dysfunction is a key pathological feature of treatment resistant major depression (TRD) that is often overlooked (1). Persistent deficits in cognition are common and serve as a mediator of psychosocial and functional outcomes. Such deficits are associated with reduced quality of life and increased likelihood of relapsing (2). Subtle cognitive deficits in depressed patients may also evade detection by traditional screening tools. Unfortunately, despite much advancement in treatment options, a significant proportion of patients who achieve symptomatic improvement in mood symptoms do not return to premorbid functioning. More recently, studies have reported promise of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) related improvements across multiple cognitive domains however whether this translates to improved functional outcomes is unknown (3). It is also unknown whether the presence of cognitive complaints impacts the antidepressant effects of rTMS. Aims & Objectives Investigate how subjective cognitive complaints impact the antidepressant response to rTMS and its relation to residual self-perceived disability, functional impairment, and quality of life. Method Naturalistic study of 457 adults with treatment resistant depression treated with high-frequency rTMS to the left DLPFC at a tertiary academic centre. rTMS treatment was provided 5 days per week for 4-6 weeks at 120% of motor threshold. Participants completed baseline measures of depression severity, perceived cognitive impairment, perceived disability, and quality of life. Measures were repeated at weeks 2, 4 and 6. Binomial logistic regression, linear regression and paired T-tests were then subsequently used for analysis. Results We observed robust antidepressant effects of rTMS with statistically significant improvements in depression severity (p<0.001), reported disability (p<0.001) and quality of life (p<0.001) following 4-6 weeks of treatment. However, there was no significant improvement in degree of subjective memory impairment but there was improvement in self-reported attentional capacity (p<0.001). Compared to those reporting minimum to mild memory impairment at baseline, those reporting moderate to severe memory impairment at baseline are less likely to achieve remission of their depressive symptoms with rTMS (20.3% vs. 42.6%). Subjective memory impairment at baseline was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor of remission following rTMS (p = 0.031, Beta = - 0.95), after controlling for age, biological sex, medical comorbidity burden, and baseline depression severity. Furthermore, residual subjective memory impairment following 4-6 weeks of rTMS was an independent predictor of disability (as measured by the WHODAS) above and beyond residual depressive symptoms (p<0.001, Beta = 0.537). Discussion & Conclusion Robust antidepressant effects are observed in response to rTMS in adults with TRD, however we observed no significant improvement in subjective memory impairment. Subjective memory impairment at baseline independently predicts poorer remission outcomes following rTMS, confirmed by logistic regression, and residual subjective memory impairment predicts perceived disability. Further research is needed to characterize the neurobiology of subjective memory impairment in order to inform future treatment protocols to optimize clinical and functional outcomes in this population. References 1. Zuckerman, H., Pan, Z., Park, C., Brietzke, E., Musial, N., Shariq, A. S., Iacobucci, M., Yim, S. J., Lui, L. M. W., Rong, C. and McIntyre, R. S. (2018) 'Recognition and Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. 2. Lam, R. W., Kennedy, S. H., McIntyre, R. S. and Khullar, A. (2014) 'Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: effects on psychosocial functioning and implications for treatment', Canadian journal of psychiatry, 59(12), pp. 649-654. 3. Hammar, Å., Ronold, E. H. and Rekkedal, G. Å. (2022) 'Cognitive Impairment and Neurocognitive Profiles in Major Depression— A Clinical Perspective', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyae059.082
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

REDEFINING RECOVERY: EXPLORING ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECTS AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION WITH REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION

Sean M. Nestor, Jennifer S. Rabin, Clement Hamani, Nir Lipsman et al.
The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

REDEFINING RECOVERY: EXPLORING ANTIDEPRESSANT EFFECTS AND COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN TREATMENT RESISTANT DEPRESSION WITH REPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION

Sean M. Nestor, Jennifer S. Rabin, Clement Hamani, Nir Lipsman, Ayan Dey, Clara Healey, Peter Giacobbe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive dysfunction is a key pathological feature of treatment resistant major depression (TRD) that is often overlooked (1). Persistent deficits in cognition are common and serve as a mediator of psychosocial and functional outcomes. Such deficits are associated with reduced quality of life and increased likelihood of relapsing (2). Subtle cognitive deficits in depressed patients may also evade detection by traditional screening tools. Unfortunately, despite much advancement in treatment options, a significant proportion of patients who achieve symptomatic improvement in mood symptoms do not return to premorbid functioning. More recently, studies have reported promise of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) related improvements across multiple cognitive domains however whether this translates to improved functional outcomes is unknown (3). It is also unknown whether the presence of cognitive complaints impacts the antidepressant effects of rTMS. Aims & Objectives Investigate how subjective cognitive complaints impact the antidepressant response to rTMS and its relation to residual self-perceived disability, functional impairment, and quality of life. Method Naturalistic study of 457 adults with treatment resistant depression treated with high-frequency rTMS to the left DLPFC at a tertiary academic centre. rTMS treatment was provided 5 days per week for 4-6 weeks at 120% of motor threshold. Participants completed baseline measures of depression severity, perceived cognitive impairment, perceived disability, and quality of life. Measures were repeated at weeks 2, 4 and 6. Binomial logistic regression, linear regression and paired T-tests were then subsequently used for analysis. Results We observed robust antidepressant effects of rTMS with statistically significant improvements in depression severity (p<0.001), reported disability (p<0.001) and quality of life (p<0.001) following 4-6 weeks of treatment. However, there was no significant improvement in degree of subjective memory impairment but there was improvement in self-reported attentional capacity (p<0.001). Compared to those reporting minimum to mild memory impairment at baseline, those reporting moderate to severe memory impairment at baseline are less likely to achieve remission of their depressive symptoms with rTMS (20.3% vs. 42.6%). Subjective memory impairment at baseline was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor of remission following rTMS (p = 0.031, Beta = - 0.95), after controlling for age, biological sex, medical comorbidity burden, and baseline depression severity. Furthermore, residual subjective memory impairment following 4-6 weeks of rTMS was an independent predictor of disability (as measured by the WHODAS) above and beyond residual depressive symptoms (p<0.001, Beta = 0.537). Discussion & Conclusion Robust antidepressant effects are observed in response to rTMS in adults with TRD, however we observed no significant improvement in subjective memory impairment. Subjective memory impairment at baseline independently predicts poorer remission outcomes following rTMS, confirmed by logistic regression, and residual subjective memory impairment predicts perceived disability. Further research is needed to characterize the neurobiology of subjective memory impairment in order to inform future treatment protocols to optimize clinical and functional outcomes in this population. References 1. Zuckerman, H., Pan, Z., Park, C., Brietzke, E., Musial, N., Shariq, A. S., Iacobucci, M., Yim, S. J., Lui, L. M. W., Rong, C. and McIntyre, R. S. (2018) 'Recognition and Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9. 2. Lam, R. W., Kennedy, S. H., McIntyre, R. S. and Khullar, A. (2014) 'Cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder: effects on psychosocial functioning and implications for treatment', Canadian journal of psychiatry, 59(12), pp. 649-654. 3. Hammar, Å., Ronold, E. H. and Rekkedal, G. Å. (2022) 'Cognitive Impairment and Neurocognitive Profiles in Major Depression— A Clinical Perspective', Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13.

The International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 28(Supplement_1)
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Neuromod (Ireland) (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.