An Error Analysis of Korean Learners in the Use of the Modern Chinese Preposition “向”: Focusing on the Substitution Errors of “向”, “对”, and “给”

This paper examines the errors that Korean learners make when using the preposition “向”. Most of the errors occur when “向” is used to indicate a target, rather than a direction. The results of the discussion can be summarized in two points:<br/> First, the most frequent substitution errors in the use of “向” to indicate a target involve confusion with the prepositions “对” and “给”. Korean learners fail to fully grasp the usage of “向” in this context, especially confusing it with the usage of other semantically similar prepositions. On the other hand, errors involving addition and omission occur less frequently, with the main causes being the interference of the native Korean particle “에게” and a lack of understanding of the correct usage of “向”.<br/> Second, to reduce the frequency of substitution errors, it is essential to distinguish the verbs that commonly combine with the three prepositions “向”, “对” and “给”. “向” originally means “to face forward(面向)”, so when indicating a target, it primarily combines with verbs related to the sense organs, concrete physical actions, actions implying potential directionality, comprehensive expression verbs, and acquisition verbs. In contrast, “对” originates from the basic meaning of “to face (面对)”, and the verbs it combines with when indicating a target differ from those that combine with “向”. “给” which originally means “to give”, typically combines with verbs that involve transmission or creation, distinguishing it from “向”.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Language Education and Research
Published
2024-11-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24285/cler.2024.11.44.413
Primary Topic
Educational Systems and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Error Analysis of Korean Learners in the Use of the Modern Chinese Preposition “向”: Focusing on the Substitution Errors of “向”, “对”, and “给”

Me‐gyeong Shin, Wei Liu
Chinese Language Education and Research
Educational Systems and Policies
article

An Error Analysis of Korean Learners in the Use of the Modern Chinese Preposition “向”: Focusing on the Substitution Errors of “向”, “对”, and “给”

Me‐gyeong Shin, Wei Liu
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the errors that Korean learners make when using the preposition “向”. Most of the errors occur when “向” is used to indicate a target, rather than a direction. The results of the discussion can be summarized in two points:<br/> First, the most frequent substitution errors in the use of “向” to indicate a target involve confusion with the prepositions “对” and “给”. Korean learners fail to fully grasp the usage of “向” in this context, especially confusing it with the usage of other semantically similar prepositions. On the other hand, errors involving addition and omission occur less frequently, with the main causes being the interference of the native Korean particle “에게” and a lack of understanding of the correct usage of “向”.<br/> Second, to reduce the frequency of substitution errors, it is essential to distinguish the verbs that commonly combine with the three prepositions “向”, “对” and “给”. “向” originally means “to face forward(面向)”, so when indicating a target, it primarily combines with verbs related to the sense organs, concrete physical actions, actions implying potential directionality, comprehensive expression verbs, and acquisition verbs. In contrast, “对” originates from the basic meaning of “to face (面对)”, and the verbs it combines with when indicating a target differ from those that combine with “向”. “给” which originally means “to give”, typically combines with verbs that involve transmission or creation, distinguishing it from “向”.

Chinese Language Education and ResearchVol. 44
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Educational Systems and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.