Characterization and analysis of printing challenges with high filled alumina filament in low‐cost extrusion‐based additive manufacturing

Abstract Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) offers promising solutions for producing fully ceramic parts using highly filled composite filaments made of polymeric binders and ceramic particles. However, the literature presents critical gaps: what materials constitute the binder, and how can the material's brittleness during the 3D printing process be managed? Addressing these questions is essential for understanding the printability of these materials and expanding their use across a wider range of 3D printers. Nanoe/Zetamix™ alumina‐filled filaments, with potential applications in Tissue Engineering, particularly in 3D‐printed scaffolds, highlight these challenges. This study focuses on three aspects: (i) material characterization; (ii) 3D printing method development; and (iii) evaluation of printed parts. Material characterization identified the filament as polyolefin‐based, likely blended with polyester, with transition temperatures indicating efficient processing and strong layer bonding. A dual‐filament method was developed to overcome brittleness, enabling the printing of small parts without damaging the filament or disrupting extrusion. Printed parts demonstrated stability, but mechanical properties varied after sintering. While the filament extruded well, brittleness impacted printability, and low viscosity affected layer stacking. This study underscores the potential of filament for scaffold fabrication but highlights the need for further research to optimize porous structure printing. Highlights Fragility of highly filled alumina composite filament limits its overall printability 3D printing with this material needs advanced knowledge and a special method Buildability depends on precise extrusion temperature and layer stacking strategy Aligned layer stacking improves material's self‐support and layer bonding capacity Material's properties are promising for 3D printing ceramic structures for bone recovery

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29581
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization and analysis of printing challenges with high filled alumina filament in low‐cost extrusion‐based additive manufacturing

Guilherme Mariz de Oliveira Barra, A. C. S. Netto, Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio, Ester Y. Nagata et al.
8 citations
Polymer Composites
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
5.46
article

Characterization and analysis of printing challenges with high filled alumina filament in low‐cost extrusion‐based additive manufacturing

Guilherme Mariz de Oliveira Barra, A. C. S. Netto, Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio, Ester Y. Nagata, Eliria María de Jesus Agnolon Pallone, Leonardo Meireles Santana, Zilda de Castro Silveira
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) offers promising solutions for producing fully ceramic parts using highly filled composite filaments made of polymeric binders and ceramic particles. However, the literature presents critical gaps: what materials constitute the binder, and how can the material's brittleness during the 3D printing process be managed? Addressing these questions is essential for understanding the printability of these materials and expanding their use across a wider range of 3D printers. Nanoe/Zetamix™ alumina‐filled filaments, with potential applications in Tissue Engineering, particularly in 3D‐printed scaffolds, highlight these challenges. This study focuses on three aspects: (i) material characterization; (ii) 3D printing method development; and (iii) evaluation of printed parts. Material characterization identified the filament as polyolefin‐based, likely blended with polyester, with transition temperatures indicating efficient processing and strong layer bonding. A dual‐filament method was developed to overcome brittleness, enabling the printing of small parts without damaging the filament or disrupting extrusion. Printed parts demonstrated stability, but mechanical properties varied after sintering. While the filament extruded well, brittleness impacted printability, and low viscosity affected layer stacking. This study underscores the potential of filament for scaffold fabrication but highlights the need for further research to optimize porous structure printing. Highlights Fragility of highly filled alumina composite filament limits its overall printability 3D printing with this material needs advanced knowledge and a special method Buildability depends on precise extrusion temperature and layer stacking strategy Aligned layer stacking improves material's self‐support and layer bonding capacity Material's properties are promising for 3D printing ceramic structures for bone recovery

Polymer CompositesVol. 46(10)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
5.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.