Characteristics and Framework for Assessing Supply and Demand Relationship for Ecosystem Services Using a Trade‐off and Synergy Lens

ABSTRACT Ecosystem services (ESs) are a pivotal interface between ecological and societal systems. Comprehending the balance between what nature offers and society demands is indispensable for fostering human prosperity. This study seeks to fill the gaps in existing knowledge, including inconsistencies in terminology, limited exploration of driving mechanisms, and the lack of a comprehensive management strategy framework in ES supply and demand research. The article comprehensively reviews the conceptual connotations and assessment methods related to ES supply and demand. The paper delves into the specific traits of studies examining the interplay between supply and demand, focusing on relationship identification, driving mechanisms, threshold effects and management strategies. And the review articulates a theoretical framework to examine the interplay of ES supply and demand as well as emphasises directions for further research. The results show that: (1) a unified definition for ES supply and demand has yet to be agreed upon. The critical part played by humans in ES supply is often neglected, and there is a corresponding scarcity of demand evaluations for such services. (2) Previous research has identified trade‐offs and synergies, analysed underlying forces and threshold effects, and proposed management strategies for the dynamics between ES supply and demand based on quantitative assessment. (3) Prospectively, the beneficiaries need to be considered more. Additional research is required to explore in‐depth the underlying processes of multi‐scale ES supply and demand. Adaptive management provides opportunities for ecosystem management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5484
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics and Framework for Assessing Supply and Demand Relationship for Ecosystem Services Using a Trade‐off and Synergy Lens

Rajiv Pandey, Lindsay C. Stringer, Shengpeng Li, Shufei Wang et al.
13 citations
Land Degradation and Development
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
14.37
article

Characteristics and Framework for Assessing Supply and Demand Relationship for Ecosystem Services Using a Trade‐off and Synergy Lens

Rajiv Pandey, Lindsay C. Stringer, Shengpeng Li, Shufei Wang, Yan Zhou, Tong Li, Jinxin He, Honey Bhatt, Yingui Cao, Rongliulian Luo
article en
13 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecosystem services (ESs) are a pivotal interface between ecological and societal systems. Comprehending the balance between what nature offers and society demands is indispensable for fostering human prosperity. This study seeks to fill the gaps in existing knowledge, including inconsistencies in terminology, limited exploration of driving mechanisms, and the lack of a comprehensive management strategy framework in ES supply and demand research. The article comprehensively reviews the conceptual connotations and assessment methods related to ES supply and demand. The paper delves into the specific traits of studies examining the interplay between supply and demand, focusing on relationship identification, driving mechanisms, threshold effects and management strategies. And the review articulates a theoretical framework to examine the interplay of ES supply and demand as well as emphasises directions for further research. The results show that: (1) a unified definition for ES supply and demand has yet to be agreed upon. The critical part played by humans in ES supply is often neglected, and there is a corresponding scarcity of demand evaluations for such services. (2) Previous research has identified trade‐offs and synergies, analysed underlying forces and threshold effects, and proposed management strategies for the dynamics between ES supply and demand based on quantitative assessment. (3) Prospectively, the beneficiaries need to be considered more. Additional research is required to explore in‐depth the underlying processes of multi‐scale ES supply and demand. Adaptive management provides opportunities for ecosystem management.

Land Degradation and DevelopmentVol. 36(6)
Forest Research Institute (IN), Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education (IN), The University of Queensland (AU), Ministry of Natural Resources (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Agriculture and Food (AU), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (CN), G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development (IN), University of York (GB), Hebei GEO University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
14.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.