Pastoral Grazing in Tanzania’s Village Forest Reserves: Unearthing Extra-Ecological Motives for (In-)Compatibility

The colonial imposition of scientific forestry in Africa criminalised a range of uses, including grazing in forests. Following decentralised forestry, village land forest reserves (VLFRs) were established in Tanzania, where villages could ostensibly prescribe customary uses. The question remains: Can VLFRs be conceived of as grazing spaces? To address this question, we conducted a qualitative, multi-scalar analysis at the village, district, and national levels. We conducted 40 interviews and 31 FGDs and reviewed 70 documents. We noted that debates about grazing-VLFR incompatibility are not exclusively hinged on ecological sustainability but a cocktail of extra-ecological concerns. These include the socio-politics of identity and belonging, costs of conservation, peace and security, and economic and scientific epistemes mobilised by different actors. Furthermore, we argue that the politics of legitimation and regulation related to dominant ideologies and institutions further complicate this relationship. We conclude that one ought to appreciate the scaled contextual and historical specificities shaping debates before passing judgment on (in)compatibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56279/jgat.v44i2.342
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pastoral Grazing in Tanzania’s Village Forest Reserves: Unearthing Extra-Ecological Motives for (In-)Compatibility

Jumanne M. Abdallah, Benezet Rwelengera
1 citations
Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
0.71
article

Pastoral Grazing in Tanzania’s Village Forest Reserves: Unearthing Extra-Ecological Motives for (In-)Compatibility

Jumanne M. Abdallah, Benezet Rwelengera
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The colonial imposition of scientific forestry in Africa criminalised a range of uses, including grazing in forests. Following decentralised forestry, village land forest reserves (VLFRs) were established in Tanzania, where villages could ostensibly prescribe customary uses. The question remains: Can VLFRs be conceived of as grazing spaces? To address this question, we conducted a qualitative, multi-scalar analysis at the village, district, and national levels. We conducted 40 interviews and 31 FGDs and reviewed 70 documents. We noted that debates about grazing-VLFR incompatibility are not exclusively hinged on ecological sustainability but a cocktail of extra-ecological concerns. These include the socio-politics of identity and belonging, costs of conservation, peace and security, and economic and scientific epistemes mobilised by different actors. Furthermore, we argue that the politics of legitimation and regulation related to dominant ideologies and institutions further complicate this relationship. We conclude that one ought to appreciate the scaled contextual and historical specificities shaping debates before passing judgment on (in)compatibility.

Journal of the Geographical Association of TanzaniaVol. 44(2)
Sokoine University of Agriculture (TZ)
Carnegie Corporation of New York, Danish International Development Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.