Left Dislocations in Heritage and Monolingual Russian

Abstract The study investigates the occurrence of left dislocations ( LD s) in a corpus of semi-spontaneous narrations produced by heritage and monolingual speakers of Russian. All speaker groups produced LD s, and LD s mostly occurred in spoken mode. Surprisingly, heritage speakers ( HS s) produced LD s more frequently than monolingual speakers, and more individuals in the HS group used LD s as compared to monolingual speakers. Also unexpectedly, formality was not significant for the distribution of LD s. Further, HS s always accented the LD -referent, frequently accented the LD -pronoun, and did not always place an IP -boundary after the LD -referent. These results confirm previous studies by Zemskaja (1973) and Westbury (2016). Finally, “simple” LD s were referentially both given and new, which is also in accordance with previous reports (Gregory & Michaelis, 2000; Zemskaja, 1973). Thus, the results of our corpus study show that the differences between monolingual speakers and HS s lie in the frequency of use of these structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heritage Language Journal
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15507076-bja10035
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Left Dislocations in Heritage and Monolingual Russian

Yulia Zuban, Sabine Zerbian, Kristina Barabashova
Heritage Language Journal
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

Left Dislocations in Heritage and Monolingual Russian

Yulia Zuban, Sabine Zerbian, Kristina Barabashova
article en

Abstract

Abstract The study investigates the occurrence of left dislocations ( LD s) in a corpus of semi-spontaneous narrations produced by heritage and monolingual speakers of Russian. All speaker groups produced LD s, and LD s mostly occurred in spoken mode. Surprisingly, heritage speakers ( HS s) produced LD s more frequently than monolingual speakers, and more individuals in the HS group used LD s as compared to monolingual speakers. Also unexpectedly, formality was not significant for the distribution of LD s. Further, HS s always accented the LD -referent, frequently accented the LD -pronoun, and did not always place an IP -boundary after the LD -referent. These results confirm previous studies by Zemskaja (1973) and Westbury (2016). Finally, “simple” LD s were referentially both given and new, which is also in accordance with previous reports (Gregory & Michaelis, 2000; Zemskaja, 1973). Thus, the results of our corpus study show that the differences between monolingual speakers and HS s lie in the frequency of use of these structures.

Heritage Language JournalVol. 22(1)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Rohde & Schwarz (Germany) (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Left Dislocations in Heritage and Monolingual Russian — Yulia Zuban, Sabine Zerbian, et al. · Heritage Language Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS