Allopatric Divergence and Secondary Contact Within a Single River System in a Freshwater Fish Group

ABSTRACT Because riverine fishes can disperse along linear river corridors and even between tributaries, allopatric divergence within river systems is limited to large rivers. Within small rivers, such as island rivers, allopatric divergence rarely occurs, and no cases of secondary contact have been reported to date. Two congeneric riverine ricefishes, Oryzias dopingdopingensis and O. landangiensis , are found in the Doping‐doping and Cerekang Rivers, respectively, on Sulawesi Island, which are connected via estuarine waters. These two species are suggested to have diverged in allopatry within this single river system. Phylogenetic and population genetic structure analyses using genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms revealed that Oryzias individuals recently discovered from the downstream Cerekang River are phylogenetically distinct not only from O. dopingdopingensis in the Doping‐doping River but also from O. landangiensis in the upstream Cerekang River. Species tree analysis and demographic model inference revealed that the downstream Cerekang Oryzias diverged from upstream Cerekang Oryzias in allopatry approximately 57,000 generations ago, and they came into secondary contact with each other approximately 22,000 generations ago. Thereafter, the upstream Cerekang population split into two populations, O. landangiensis and O. dopingdopingensis , approximately 14,000 generations ago. We are not aware of any freshwater fish groups that may have experienced both allopatric divergence and secondary contact within such a small single river system. The allopatric divergence and secondary contact within the Cerekang–Doping‐doping River system can be explained by assuming that a lake once existed in this region, where many tectonic lakes have formed and disappeared because of the collision and/or juxtaposition of tectonic subdivisions since the Pliocene/Pleistocene. Gene flow from O. landangiensis to the downstream Cerekang Oryzias is also evident. Although the secondary contact between the upstream and downstream Cerekang populations was estimated to have occurred more than 40,000 years ago, they are still not completely homogenised within the linear corridor of the Cerekang River. This stagnation of homogenisation can be explained by their weak dispersal ability, which may reflect past adaptation to lacustrine environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Freshwater Biology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.70004
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allopatric Divergence and Secondary Contact Within a Single River System in a Freshwater Fish Group

Sjamsu Alam Lawelle, Kawilarang W. A. Masengi, Kazunori Yamahira, Ilham V. Utama et al.
Freshwater Biology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Allopatric Divergence and Secondary Contact Within a Single River System in a Freshwater Fish Group

Sjamsu Alam Lawelle, Kawilarang W. A. Masengi, Kazunori Yamahira, Ilham V. Utama, Ixchel F. Mandagi, Atsushi J. Nagano, Junko Kusumi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Because riverine fishes can disperse along linear river corridors and even between tributaries, allopatric divergence within river systems is limited to large rivers. Within small rivers, such as island rivers, allopatric divergence rarely occurs, and no cases of secondary contact have been reported to date. Two congeneric riverine ricefishes, Oryzias dopingdopingensis and O. landangiensis , are found in the Doping‐doping and Cerekang Rivers, respectively, on Sulawesi Island, which are connected via estuarine waters. These two species are suggested to have diverged in allopatry within this single river system. Phylogenetic and population genetic structure analyses using genome‐wide single nucleotide polymorphisms revealed that Oryzias individuals recently discovered from the downstream Cerekang River are phylogenetically distinct not only from O. dopingdopingensis in the Doping‐doping River but also from O. landangiensis in the upstream Cerekang River. Species tree analysis and demographic model inference revealed that the downstream Cerekang Oryzias diverged from upstream Cerekang Oryzias in allopatry approximately 57,000 generations ago, and they came into secondary contact with each other approximately 22,000 generations ago. Thereafter, the upstream Cerekang population split into two populations, O. landangiensis and O. dopingdopingensis , approximately 14,000 generations ago. We are not aware of any freshwater fish groups that may have experienced both allopatric divergence and secondary contact within such a small single river system. The allopatric divergence and secondary contact within the Cerekang–Doping‐doping River system can be explained by assuming that a lake once existed in this region, where many tectonic lakes have formed and disappeared because of the collision and/or juxtaposition of tectonic subdivisions since the Pliocene/Pleistocene. Gene flow from O. landangiensis to the downstream Cerekang Oryzias is also evident. Although the secondary contact between the upstream and downstream Cerekang populations was estimated to have occurred more than 40,000 years ago, they are still not completely homogenised within the linear corridor of the Cerekang River. This stagnation of homogenisation can be explained by their weak dispersal ability, which may reflect past adaptation to lacustrine environments.

Freshwater BiologyVol. 70(2)
Ryukoku University (JP), Kyushu University (JP), Keio University (JP), University of the Ryukyus (JP), Universitas Halu Oleo (ID), Sam Ratulangi University (ID)
University of the Ryukyus, Universitas Sam Ratulangi, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.