Water Quality Classification using XGBoost method

Water quality is threatened by a multitude of pollutants, which makes it impossible to provide humans with clean water. As a result, the importance of predicting and forecasting water quality is growing in order to reduce water pollution. Currently, expensive and time-consuming laboratory and statistical testing are used to evaluate the quality of water. In addition, machine learning techniques are used to evaluate the quality of water, such as SVM, KNN, and ANN. However, these techniques take longer to finish and are less accurate. In order to classify water quality, the tree-based XGBoost algorithm is utilized. One of a data set’s seven attributes, the Water Quality Index (WQI), is used to classify the WQC. A confusion matrix is used to assess this strategy’s effectiveness. With an accuracy rate of 94%, the analysis results showed that the XGBoost model performed better than the others. With XGBoost, just 6% of the data were misclassified. This approach is better since it can perform out-of-core calculations more quickly. Moreover, with an average accuracy of 90%, XGBoost continuously exceeded the fivefold validation. Because of its improved performance, it has been shown that XGBoost is more successful in improving the quality of the water.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icccmla63077.2024.10871422
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Quality Classification using XGBoost method

V. Usha, U Jyothi, G. Divya, Tamminina Ammannamma et al.
3 citations
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.60
article

Water Quality Classification using XGBoost method

V. Usha, U Jyothi, G. Divya, Tamminina Ammannamma, A. Nageswari
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Water quality is threatened by a multitude of pollutants, which makes it impossible to provide humans with clean water. As a result, the importance of predicting and forecasting water quality is growing in order to reduce water pollution. Currently, expensive and time-consuming laboratory and statistical testing are used to evaluate the quality of water. In addition, machine learning techniques are used to evaluate the quality of water, such as SVM, KNN, and ANN. However, these techniques take longer to finish and are less accurate. In order to classify water quality, the tree-based XGBoost algorithm is utilized. One of a data set’s seven attributes, the Water Quality Index (WQI), is used to classify the WQC. A confusion matrix is used to assess this strategy’s effectiveness. With an accuracy rate of 94%, the analysis results showed that the XGBoost model performed better than the others. With XGBoost, just 6% of the data were misclassified. This approach is better since it can perform out-of-core calculations more quickly. Moreover, with an average accuracy of 90%, XGBoost continuously exceeded the fivefold validation. Because of its improved performance, it has been shown that XGBoost is more successful in improving the quality of the water.

Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Water Quality Classification using XGBoost method — V. Usha, U Jyothi, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS