Empirical Models of Shallow Groundwater and Multi‐Hazard Flood Forecasts as Sea‐Levels Rise

Abstract Knowledge of coastal hydrogeology and hazards as groundwater responds to sea‐level rise (SLR) can be improved through installation of shallow groundwater monitoring piezometers and continuous observations. Interpolation of site data enables mapping of the present‐day state of groundwater elevation, depth to groundwater (DTW), their temporal statistical variation, and differing spatial responses to tides and rainfall. Future DTW and its variability can be projected under increments of SLR, with assumptions and caveats, to show where and when episodic and/or permanent inundation can be expected. This methodology is outlined in a case study of Dunedin, New Zealand, which enabled comparison of rising groundwater's contribution to pluvial flooding and groundwater emergence with coastal inundation. Changes in relative land exposure with SLR shows evolution in flood hazard from current pluvial‐dominated events, into “flooding from below” and groundwater emergence, in advance of any overland coastal inundation. Dunedin exemplifies how groundwater transfers effects of SLR surprisingly far inland, but the lowest‐lying or shoreline‐proximal suburbs are not necessarily the most vulnerable. Unlike coastal inundation, rising groundwater is unconstrained by protective topography and presents as a creeping hazard, or contributor to hazards such as pluvial flooding, which can be widespread, occurring already and difficult to defend against. The empirical models contain assumptions and uncertainties important to the veracity of results and application. While conservative (“risk averse”) and a compromise from computationally expensive numerical solutions, their value is in providing the spatial and temporal precision needed for multi‐source hazard assessment and holistic adaptive planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ef004977
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empirical Models of Shallow Groundwater and Multi‐Hazard Flood Forecasts as Sea‐Levels Rise

Scott Stephens, Simon C. Cox, Lee Chambers, Antoni Moore et al.
2 citations
Earth s Future
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Empirical Models of Shallow Groundwater and Multi‐Hazard Flood Forecasts as Sea‐Levels Rise

Scott Stephens, Simon C. Cox, Lee Chambers, Antoni Moore, Ivan Diaz‐Rainey, G. E. Bodeker, Quyen Nguyen, Marc Ettema
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge of coastal hydrogeology and hazards as groundwater responds to sea‐level rise (SLR) can be improved through installation of shallow groundwater monitoring piezometers and continuous observations. Interpolation of site data enables mapping of the present‐day state of groundwater elevation, depth to groundwater (DTW), their temporal statistical variation, and differing spatial responses to tides and rainfall. Future DTW and its variability can be projected under increments of SLR, with assumptions and caveats, to show where and when episodic and/or permanent inundation can be expected. This methodology is outlined in a case study of Dunedin, New Zealand, which enabled comparison of rising groundwater's contribution to pluvial flooding and groundwater emergence with coastal inundation. Changes in relative land exposure with SLR shows evolution in flood hazard from current pluvial‐dominated events, into “flooding from below” and groundwater emergence, in advance of any overland coastal inundation. Dunedin exemplifies how groundwater transfers effects of SLR surprisingly far inland, but the lowest‐lying or shoreline‐proximal suburbs are not necessarily the most vulnerable. Unlike coastal inundation, rising groundwater is unconstrained by protective topography and presents as a creeping hazard, or contributor to hazards such as pluvial flooding, which can be widespread, occurring already and difficult to defend against. The empirical models contain assumptions and uncertainties important to the veracity of results and application. While conservative (“risk averse”) and a compromise from computationally expensive numerical solutions, their value is in providing the spatial and temporal precision needed for multi‐source hazard assessment and holistic adaptive planning.

Earth s FutureVol. 13(2)
Griffith University (AU), GNS Science (NZ), Bodeker Scientific (New Zealand) (NZ), National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.