Initial Effects of Clearcutting and Partial Retention Forest Harvesting Methods on Some Small Mammals in Northern British Columbia

British Columbia’s interior forests have been heavily subjected to logging, burning, and beetle outbreaks for decades. Partial retention forest harvesting may be a method that could mitigate some of the negative effects of clearcut harvesting on wildlife. We conducted live trapping for small mammals at John Prince Research Forest in north-central BC to estimate species diversity, population density, and habitat use across a gradient of overstory tree retention. We detected 7 species, with diversity highest in the uncut forest (control) relative to the clearcut (control mean Shannon Index = 1.01, SE = 0.14) and partial retention treatments (30% and 60% retention, mean Shannon Indices = 0.99, 0.98; SE = 0.17, 0.17), and significantly lower in the seed tree treatment (mean = 0.63, SE = 0.17, p = 0.02). Greater population densities of North American deer mouse (Peromyscus sonoriensis) and southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi) in partially harvested stands, as estimated with spatially explicit capture-recapture models, support these practices for supporting populations of forest specialists. More experimental approaches to forest operations are needed across larger spatial scales, such as adaptive management of forest harvest methods with rigorous wildlife monitoring to ensure ecological objectives are met.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecosystems and Management
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22230/jem.2025v25n1a637
Primary Topic
Ecology and biodiversity studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial Effects of Clearcutting and Partial Retention Forest Harvesting Methods on Some Small Mammals in Northern British Columbia

Suzanne W. Simard, Alexia Constantinou, Dexter P. Hodder, A. Cole Burton
2 links
Journal of Ecosystems and Management
Ecology and biodiversity studies
article

Initial Effects of Clearcutting and Partial Retention Forest Harvesting Methods on Some Small Mammals in Northern British Columbia

Suzanne W. Simard, Alexia Constantinou, Dexter P. Hodder, A. Cole Burton
article en

Abstract

British Columbia’s interior forests have been heavily subjected to logging, burning, and beetle outbreaks for decades. Partial retention forest harvesting may be a method that could mitigate some of the negative effects of clearcut harvesting on wildlife. We conducted live trapping for small mammals at John Prince Research Forest in north-central BC to estimate species diversity, population density, and habitat use across a gradient of overstory tree retention. We detected 7 species, with diversity highest in the uncut forest (control) relative to the clearcut (control mean Shannon Index = 1.01, SE = 0.14) and partial retention treatments (30% and 60% retention, mean Shannon Indices = 0.99, 0.98; SE = 0.17, 0.17), and significantly lower in the seed tree treatment (mean = 0.63, SE = 0.17, p = 0.02). Greater population densities of North American deer mouse (Peromyscus sonoriensis) and southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi) in partially harvested stands, as estimated with spatially explicit capture-recapture models, support these practices for supporting populations of forest specialists. More experimental approaches to forest operations are needed across larger spatial scales, such as adaptive management of forest harvest methods with rigorous wildlife monitoring to ensure ecological objectives are met.

Journal of Ecosystems and ManagementVol. 25(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Northern British Columbia (CA), University of Victoria (CA)
University of British Columbia, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Ecology and biodiversity studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.