Generational Attitudes to Teaching Approaches in Economic Education: Case in Bulgaria
Abstract Introduction: The article aims to identify generational attitudes towards appropriate teaching applied to teaching economic disciplines in Bulgaria higher school. The object of research is the students of three generations - X, Y and Z, and the teachers who carry out their education in economics. The research subject is the perceptions and attitudes of students of the three generations - X, Y and Z, and the teaching methods applied for educational purposes. Methods: A descriptive research strategy was used in the article. Data were collected through an online structured questionnaire survey and processed by rank correlation using Kendall’s tau-b and Spearman methods. Results: As a result of the research, it is established that there is no dependence between the characteristics of individual generations and the preferred teaching methods. Discussion: Find that different generational characteristics do not affect ads for acquiring new knowledge and skills during the educational process. Limitations: Only representatives of generations X, Y, and Z were studied in Bulgaria. The study covers the trainees’ current advertising, taking into account the results that are statistically significant. Conclusions: The study found no significant differences in learners’ preferences for teaching methods. Therefore, educators can choose appropriate approaches involving interactive video content and smart devices.
Authors
- Zhelyo Zhelev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-8230)
- Даниела Илиева (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-9253)
- Драгомир Илиев (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-6177)
Institutions
- D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics (BG)
- Angel Kanchev University of Ruse (BG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Acta Educationis Generalis
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2025-0006
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Education, Sociology, Communication Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 16.49