How Do Different Forms of Note‐Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning?

Abstract The present study compared learning gains at both form recall and meaning recall levels across three learning conditions: viewing without note‐taking, viewing with conventional note‐taking, and viewing with guided note‐taking. A total of 134 Chinese learners of English were assigned to three experimental groups and a no‐treatment control group. Results showed that (a) guided note‐taking contributed to greater vocabulary learning than conventional note‐taking on the form recall test, (b) both guided and conventional note‐taking contributed to significant vocabulary gains on the meaning recall test, and (c) viewing without note‐taking did not contribute to significant learning gains. The analyses also revealed that writing unknown words in notes, the inclusion of target words in the lecture slides, and learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge affected learning, but frequency of occurrence, word length, and learners’ level of viewing comprehension did not.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language Learning
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12705
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Different Forms of Note‐Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning?

Zhouhan Jin, Stuart Webb
5 citations
Language Learning
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
17.22
article

How Do Different Forms of Note‐Taking Affect Second Language Vocabulary Learning?

Zhouhan Jin, Stuart Webb
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The present study compared learning gains at both form recall and meaning recall levels across three learning conditions: viewing without note‐taking, viewing with conventional note‐taking, and viewing with guided note‐taking. A total of 134 Chinese learners of English were assigned to three experimental groups and a no‐treatment control group. Results showed that (a) guided note‐taking contributed to greater vocabulary learning than conventional note‐taking on the form recall test, (b) both guided and conventional note‐taking contributed to significant vocabulary gains on the meaning recall test, and (c) viewing without note‐taking did not contribute to significant learning gains. The analyses also revealed that writing unknown words in notes, the inclusion of target words in the lecture slides, and learners’ prior vocabulary knowledge affected learning, but frequency of occurrence, word length, and learners’ level of viewing comprehension did not.

Language LearningVol. 75(4)
Western University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
17.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.