Agree to Disagree: Robust Anomaly Detection with Noisy Labels

Due to the scarcity of reliable anomaly labels, recent anomaly detection methods leveraging noisy auto-generated labels either select clean samples or refurbish noisy labels. However, both approaches struggle due to the unique properties of anomalies. Sample selection often fails to separate sufficiently many clean anomaly samples from noisy ones, while label refurbishment erroneously refurbishes marginal clean samples. To overcome these limitations, we design Unity, the first learning from noisy labels (LNL) approach for anomaly detection that elegantly leverages the merits of both sample selection and label refurbishment to iteratively prepare a diverse clean sample set for network training. Unity uses a pair of deep anomaly networks to collaboratively select samples with clean labels based on prediction agreement, followed by a disagreement resolution mechanism to capture marginal samples with clean labels. Thereafter, Unity utilizes unique properties of anomalies to design an anomaly-centric contrastive learning strategy that accurately refurbishes the remaining noisy labels. The resulting set, composed of selected and refurbished clean samples, will be used to train the anomaly networks in the next training round. Our experimental study on 10 real-world benchmark datasets demonstrates that Unity consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LNL techniques by up to 0.31 in F-1 Score (0.52 \rightarrow 0.83).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Published
2025-02-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3709657
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agree to Disagree: Robust Anomaly Detection with Noisy Labels

Elke A. Rundensteiner, Joshua DeOliveira, Huayi Zhang, Lei Cao et al.
3 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
7.44
article

Agree to Disagree: Robust Anomaly Detection with Noisy Labels

Elke A. Rundensteiner, Joshua DeOliveira, Huayi Zhang, Lei Cao, Peter M. VanNostrand, Dennis M. Hofmann, Lei Ma
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Due to the scarcity of reliable anomaly labels, recent anomaly detection methods leveraging noisy auto-generated labels either select clean samples or refurbish noisy labels. However, both approaches struggle due to the unique properties of anomalies. Sample selection often fails to separate sufficiently many clean anomaly samples from noisy ones, while label refurbishment erroneously refurbishes marginal clean samples. To overcome these limitations, we design Unity, the first learning from noisy labels (LNL) approach for anomaly detection that elegantly leverages the merits of both sample selection and label refurbishment to iteratively prepare a diverse clean sample set for network training. Unity uses a pair of deep anomaly networks to collaboratively select samples with clean labels based on prediction agreement, followed by a disagreement resolution mechanism to capture marginal samples with clean labels. Thereafter, Unity utilizes unique properties of anomalies to design an anomaly-centric contrastive learning strategy that accurately refurbishes the remaining noisy labels. The resulting set, composed of selected and refurbished clean samples, will be used to train the anomaly networks in the next training round. Our experimental study on 10 real-world benchmark datasets demonstrates that Unity consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LNL techniques by up to 0.31 in F-1 Score (0.52 \rightarrow 0.83).

Proceedings of the ACM on Management of DataVol. 3(1)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), University of Arizona (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.