Choosing the Right Ontology to Describe Research Data in the Energy Domain

As in all disciplines, increasing the FAIRness (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) of research data and software is a goal in energy research. In order to achieve this, it is important to identify the most appropriate ontology for the description of research data and software. However, despite the importance of this task, it still presents a significant challenge. While there are some comparisons of ontologies, a gap exists in assessing their usefulness according to ontology metadata. This paper fills this gap by defining 21 criteria sorted into four categories to help researchers choose ontologies in the energy domain. The criteria are used to compare eight ontologies for energy research to showcase their use and analyze the ontologies. The analysis reveals the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) as the top-ranked ontology. This underscores the importance of metadata comparison in ontology selection and highlights the benefits of incorporating metadata criteria into ontology terminology services to support researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3717413.3717417
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Semantic Web and Ontologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choosing the Right Ontology to Describe Research Data in the Energy Domain

Astrid Nieße, Stephan Ferenz, Alexandro Steinert
1 citations
ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics Review
Semantic Web and Ontologies
0.35
article

Choosing the Right Ontology to Describe Research Data in the Energy Domain

Astrid Nieße, Stephan Ferenz, Alexandro Steinert
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As in all disciplines, increasing the FAIRness (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) of research data and software is a goal in energy research. In order to achieve this, it is important to identify the most appropriate ontology for the description of research data and software. However, despite the importance of this task, it still presents a significant challenge. While there are some comparisons of ontologies, a gap exists in assessing their usefulness according to ontology metadata. This paper fills this gap by defining 21 criteria sorted into four categories to help researchers choose ontologies in the energy domain. The criteria are used to compare eight ontologies for energy research to showcase their use and analyze the ontologies. The analysis reveals the Open Energy Ontology (OEO) as the top-ranked ontology. This underscores the importance of metadata comparison in ontology selection and highlights the benefits of incorporating metadata criteria into ontology terminology services to support researchers.

ACM SIGEnergy Energy Informatics ReviewVol. 4(4)
Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Semantic Web and Ontologies
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.