Comparison of Chemometric Explorative Multi‐Omics Data Analysis Methods Applied to a Mechanistic Pan‐Cancer Cell Model

ABSTRACT The analysis of single cell multi‐omics data is a complex task, and many explorative data analysis methods are being used to draw information from such data. This paper compares several of these methods to visualize the output of a mechanistic model under various simulated conditions. The analysis methods include PCA, PARAFAC, ASCA, MASCARA, COVSCA, P‐ESCA, and PE‐ASCA. These techniques, applied to high‐dimensional data such as gene expression and protein levels, assess correlations across time series and experimental conditions. The study uses a complex mechanistic model of MCF10A cancer cells, simulating interactions between signaling pathways related to cell growth and division. Results show that while methods like PCA PARAFAC and ASCA reveal time‐dependent variations in protein data, mRNA data exhibit minimal systematic variation. MASCARA offers unique insights by identifying genes linked to specific pathways. This work highlights the potential and limitations of various data analysis methods in understanding multi‐omics data, particularly in single‐cell contexts where experimental variation and stochastic processes complicate interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemometrics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.70001
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Chemometric Explorative Multi‐Omics Data Analysis Methods Applied to a Mechanistic Pan‐Cancer Cell Model

Frans van der Kloet, Johan A. Westerhuis, Fred White, Huub C. J. Hoefsloot et al.
Journal of Chemometrics
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

Comparison of Chemometric Explorative Multi‐Omics Data Analysis Methods Applied to a Mechanistic Pan‐Cancer Cell Model

Frans van der Kloet, Johan A. Westerhuis, Fred White, Huub C. J. Hoefsloot, Anna Heintz‐Buschart, Geert Roelof van der Ploeg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The analysis of single cell multi‐omics data is a complex task, and many explorative data analysis methods are being used to draw information from such data. This paper compares several of these methods to visualize the output of a mechanistic model under various simulated conditions. The analysis methods include PCA, PARAFAC, ASCA, MASCARA, COVSCA, P‐ESCA, and PE‐ASCA. These techniques, applied to high‐dimensional data such as gene expression and protein levels, assess correlations across time series and experimental conditions. The study uses a complex mechanistic model of MCF10A cancer cells, simulating interactions between signaling pathways related to cell growth and division. Results show that while methods like PCA PARAFAC and ASCA reveal time‐dependent variations in protein data, mRNA data exhibit minimal systematic variation. MASCARA offers unique insights by identifying genes linked to specific pathways. This work highlights the potential and limitations of various data analysis methods in understanding multi‐omics data, particularly in single‐cell contexts where experimental variation and stochastic processes complicate interpretation.

Journal of ChemometricsVol. 39(2)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Chemometric Explorative Multi‐Omics Data Analysis Methods Applied to a Mechanistic Pan‐Cancer Cell Model — Frans van der Kloet, Johan A. Westerhuis, et al. · Journal of Chemometrics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS