Energy Sharing Concepts – Comparing Large Scale Local Energy Markets and Collective Self Consumption

End customers can perform energy sharing through Collective Self Consumption (CSC) and in Local Energy Markets (LEMs). While CSC is often performed in energy communities collectively investing in a PV system, LEMs can be applied to communities with distributed generation systems. To compare both concepts, we introduce a model that simulates CSC and LEMs for large-scale energy communities. The model solves a linear optimization problem representing all participants with their generators, loads, and flexibility. Each participant can self-consume electricity, buy or sell it to an energy supplier, or share energy with other participants. We apply our model to a large-scale energy community with 1300 participants. The results show that CSC and LEMs benefit all participants. CSC restricts energy sharing more than LEMs, leading to lower self-sufficiency rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/isgteurope62998.2024.10863293
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Sharing Concepts – Comparing Large Scale Local Energy Markets and Collective Self Consumption

Klemens Schumann, Andreas Ulbig, Oliver Banovic
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

Energy Sharing Concepts – Comparing Large Scale Local Energy Markets and Collective Self Consumption

Klemens Schumann, Andreas Ulbig, Oliver Banovic
article en

Abstract

End customers can perform energy sharing through Collective Self Consumption (CSC) and in Local Energy Markets (LEMs). While CSC is often performed in energy communities collectively investing in a PV system, LEMs can be applied to communities with distributed generation systems. To compare both concepts, we introduce a model that simulates CSC and LEMs for large-scale energy communities. The model solves a linear optimization problem representing all participants with their generators, loads, and flexibility. Each participant can self-consume electricity, buy or sell it to an energy supplier, or share energy with other participants. We apply our model to a large-scale energy community with 1300 participants. The results show that CSC and LEMs benefit all participants. CSC restricts energy sharing more than LEMs, leading to lower self-sufficiency rates.

Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy Sharing Concepts – Comparing Large Scale Local Energy Markets and Collective Self Consumption — Klemens Schumann, Andreas Ulbig, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS