Assessment of Efficient and Cost-Effective Vehicle Detection in Foggy Weather

Efficient and cost-effective vehicle detection under foggy and smoggy weather conditions remains a significant challenge in the domains of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), Collision Avoidance Systems (CAS), and traffic surveillance. Vehicle detection in foggy weather, a critical requirement for preventing road collisions and ensuring driver assistance, has not been adequately evaluated. The state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm, YOLO-V11 network architecture, is studied and evaluated for efficient and cost-effective vehicle detection in diverse foggy weather road driving conditions. To our knowledge, YOLO-V11 performance has not been evaluated in diverse foggy weather road driving conditions. The vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature (DAWN) and Foggy Driving (FD) datasets are utilized for the performance evaluation across diverse object detection performance metrics. The DAWN and FD datasets are customized and self-annotated to four vehicle detection classes: buses, cars, motorcycles, and trucks. Extensive experiments are performed to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of YOLO-V11 models on DAWN and FD datasets. YOLO-V11s model outperformed with 73.1 % mAP and 71 % F1 score on the DAWN dataset and YOLO-V11m outperformed with 47.7 % mAP and 47 % F1 score. The recall and precision score of YOLO-V11m is higher on the DAWN dataset. Whereas, the recall score of the YOLO-V111 model is higher on the DAWN dataset and the precision score of YOLO-V11n is higher on the FD dataset. YOLO-V11 outperformed with an inference speed of 26 FPS on the DAWN dataset and YOLO-V11n outperformed with an inference speed of 13 FPS on the FD dataset. The comparative analysis concludes that the YOLO-V11n and YOLO-V11s models detect vehicles with faster inference speeds while maintaining high accuracy. Conversely, YOLO-V11m and YOLO-V111 models detect vehicles with enhanced accuracy but at the cost of slower inference speeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icosst64562.2024.10871157
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Efficient and Cost-Effective Vehicle Detection in Foggy Weather

Naeem Raza, Mudassar Ahmad, Muhammad Asif Habib
5 citations
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.03
article

Assessment of Efficient and Cost-Effective Vehicle Detection in Foggy Weather

Naeem Raza, Mudassar Ahmad, Muhammad Asif Habib
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Efficient and cost-effective vehicle detection under foggy and smoggy weather conditions remains a significant challenge in the domains of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), Collision Avoidance Systems (CAS), and traffic surveillance. Vehicle detection in foggy weather, a critical requirement for preventing road collisions and ensuring driver assistance, has not been adequately evaluated. The state-of-the-art deep learning algorithm, YOLO-V11 network architecture, is studied and evaluated for efficient and cost-effective vehicle detection in diverse foggy weather road driving conditions. To our knowledge, YOLO-V11 performance has not been evaluated in diverse foggy weather road driving conditions. The vehicle Detection in Adverse Weather Nature (DAWN) and Foggy Driving (FD) datasets are utilized for the performance evaluation across diverse object detection performance metrics. The DAWN and FD datasets are customized and self-annotated to four vehicle detection classes: buses, cars, motorcycles, and trucks. Extensive experiments are performed to assess the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of YOLO-V11 models on DAWN and FD datasets. YOLO-V11s model outperformed with 73.1 % mAP and 71 % F1 score on the DAWN dataset and YOLO-V11m outperformed with 47.7 % mAP and 47 % F1 score. The recall and precision score of YOLO-V11m is higher on the DAWN dataset. Whereas, the recall score of the YOLO-V111 model is higher on the DAWN dataset and the precision score of YOLO-V11n is higher on the FD dataset. YOLO-V11 outperformed with an inference speed of 26 FPS on the DAWN dataset and YOLO-V11n outperformed with an inference speed of 13 FPS on the FD dataset. The comparative analysis concludes that the YOLO-V11n and YOLO-V11s models detect vehicles with faster inference speeds while maintaining high accuracy. Conversely, YOLO-V11m and YOLO-V111 models detect vehicles with enhanced accuracy but at the cost of slower inference speeds.

Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), National Textile University (PK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
1.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.