Electric Vehicle Charging Management with Droop Control

Increasing residential electricity demand due to simultaneous charging of multiple electric vehicles (EVs) on the same feeder might lead to overloading of the distribution transformers as well as under-voltage at remote terminals of the feeder. In this paper, two different droop control techniques have been proposed for EV charging management to mitigate such problems by reducing the charging load on the basis of droop factors corresponding to the terminal voltage deviation or transformer loading level. Such a control strategy reduces the feeder congestion and improves the terminal voltage at the feeder end. However, since the voltage drop increases as the distance from the substation is increasing, the customers located at the far end of the feeder will suffer from higher curtailment of the charging power in comparison to the customers who are connected closer to the sub-station. Thus, there will be disparity among the customers depending upon their distance from the sub-station and the customers at the far end of the feeder will face more restrictions, thereby limiting their benefit from the dynamic pricing of electricity. On the other hand, when the droop control is based on transformer loading level, a common factor will be applied to all the EV charging loads on the feeder, so everybody will be equally affected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/powercon60995.2024.10870527
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electric Vehicle Charging Management with Droop Control

Hessam Golmohamadi, Sanjay K. Chaudhary, Birgitte Bak‐Jensen, Rakesh Sinha
3 citations
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.63
article

Electric Vehicle Charging Management with Droop Control

Hessam Golmohamadi, Sanjay K. Chaudhary, Birgitte Bak‐Jensen, Rakesh Sinha
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Increasing residential electricity demand due to simultaneous charging of multiple electric vehicles (EVs) on the same feeder might lead to overloading of the distribution transformers as well as under-voltage at remote terminals of the feeder. In this paper, two different droop control techniques have been proposed for EV charging management to mitigate such problems by reducing the charging load on the basis of droop factors corresponding to the terminal voltage deviation or transformer loading level. Such a control strategy reduces the feeder congestion and improves the terminal voltage at the feeder end. However, since the voltage drop increases as the distance from the substation is increasing, the customers located at the far end of the feeder will suffer from higher curtailment of the charging power in comparison to the customers who are connected closer to the sub-station. Thus, there will be disparity among the customers depending upon their distance from the sub-station and the customers at the far end of the feeder will face more restrictions, thereby limiting their benefit from the dynamic pricing of electricity. On the other hand, when the droop control is based on transformer loading level, a common factor will be applied to all the EV charging loads on the feeder, so everybody will be equally affected.

Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Electric Vehicle Charging Management with Droop Control — Hessam Golmohamadi, Sanjay K. Chaudhary, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS